Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Infra monitoring › Site24x7 vs New Relic
Infrastructure monitoring · November 2026 Edition

Site24x7 vs New Relic

Two of fourteen models named Site24x7 first on the direct prompt; one named New Relic. Site24x7 was named by twelve of the fourteen models and New Relic by fourteen and Site24x7 carries 27 labels and New Relic 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Site24x7

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

New Relic

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share12%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels2749A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Site24x7 reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Datadog was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Datadog vs Site24x7 · Datadog vs New Relic · Zabbix vs Site24x7

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the infrastructure monitoring page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Site24x7First choices, of fourteen modelsNew Relic
Direct211 against New Relic
Paraphrase41
Comparative01
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against Site24x7 · 5 against New Relic
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Site24x7 and New Relic stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Site24x7 New Relic first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Site24x7 on the left and New Relic on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Site24x7 and New Relic stood in it.

Site24x7 first, New Relic not the choice

2 of 14 modelsNew Relic was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2Site24x7 alternatives: Coralogix, Motadata ObserveOps, Paessler PRTG, Zabbix
MiniMax M2.5Site24x7 alternatives: Datadog, LogicMonitor, NinjaOne

New Relic first, Site24x7 an alternative

1 of 14 modelsSite24x7 was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Muse Glimmer 30BDatadog, New Relic alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, Zabbix

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniDatadog alternatives: Grafana, New Relic
Gemini 3.5 FlashGrafana alternatives: Better Stack, LogicMonitor, New Relic
Grok 4.20Datadog alternatives: Motadata ObserveOps, New Relic, NinjaOne, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, Zabbix
DeepSeek V4 FlashLogicMonitor alternatives: New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Site24x7
Qwen 3.7 FlashDatadog alternatives: Checkmk, LogicMonitor, Site24x7, Zabbix
GLM 4.7 FlashXLogicMonitor alternatives: Datadog, New Relic
GPT-6 LunaDatadog alternatives: Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Perplexity SonarLogicMonitor alternatives: Better Stack, Datadog, Netdata, Zabbix
Mistral SmallDatadog alternatives: Middleware.io, NinjaOne, Zabbix
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Site24x7 leads by fifteen points.
Site24x727%#1 of 16
New Relic12%#3 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Site24x7 leads by six points.
Site24x712%#3 of 16
New Relic6%#6 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: New Relic leads at enterprise.
New Relic4%#4 of 14
Site24x70%#– of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Site24x7

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about New Relic

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.