Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Infra monitoring › Grafana vs Prometheus
Infrastructure monitoring · November 2026 Edition

Grafana vs Prometheus

One of fourteen models named Grafana first on the direct prompt; zero named Prometheus. Grafana was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Prometheus by thirteen and Grafana carries 33 labels and Prometheus 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Grafana

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Prometheus

criticized challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share8%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate15%26%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels3331A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Grafana reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Datadog was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Datadog vs Grafana · Datadog vs Prometheus · Zabbix vs Grafana

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the infrastructure monitoring page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GrafanaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPrometheus
Direct101 against Prometheus
Paraphrase101 against Grafana · 1 against Prometheus
Comparative02
Budget-constrained12
Scale-constrained102 against Grafana · 3 against Prometheus
Negative002 against Grafana · 3 against Prometheus
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Grafana and Prometheus were named in the same answer 110 times, of the 332 answers naming Grafana and the 351 naming Prometheus. In those answers Prometheus took the first choice four times and Grafana thirteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Grafana and Prometheus stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Grafana Prometheus first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Grafana on the left and Prometheus on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Grafana and Prometheus stood in it.

Grafana first, Prometheus not the choice

1 of 14 modelsPrometheus was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGrafana alternatives: Better Stack, LogicMonitor, New Relic

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniDatadog alternatives: Grafana, New Relic
GPT-6 LunaDatadog alternatives: Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Perplexity SonarLogicMonitor alternatives: Better Stack, Datadog, Netdata, Zabbix
Grok 4.20Datadog alternatives: Motadata ObserveOps, New Relic, NinjaOne, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, Zabbix
Mistral SmallDatadog alternatives: Middleware.io, NinjaOne, Zabbix
DeepSeek V4 FlashLogicMonitor alternatives: New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Site24x7
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashDatadog alternatives: Checkmk, LogicMonitor, Site24x7, Zabbix
Kimi K2Site24x7 alternatives: Coralogix, Motadata ObserveOps, Paessler PRTG, Zabbix
GLM 4.7 FlashXLogicMonitor alternatives: Datadog, New Relic
MiniMax M2.5Site24x7 alternatives: Datadog, LogicMonitor, NinjaOne
Muse Glimmer 30BDatadog, New Relic alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, Zabbix

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Grafana leads by eight points.
Grafana8%#5 of 16
Prometheus0%#13 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Grafana leads by four points.
Grafana8%#5 of 16
Prometheus4%#8 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Grafana leads by two points.
Grafana2%#7 of 14
Prometheus0%#13 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Grafana

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Open-source like Zabbix/Prometheus + Grafana work if you have in-house talent for maintenance, but they add operational burden.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious if it's internet-facing without properly configured authentication, permissions, and network restrictions.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“High learning curve; limited GUI configuration options; requires significant manual config file editing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative

What the models said about Prometheus

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Open-source like Zabbix/Prometheus + Grafana work if you have in-house talent for maintenance, but they add operational burden.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Don't expose Prometheus, Alertmanager, exporters, or their metrics and debugging endpoints directly to the public internet.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Kubernetes & Cloud-Native (Budget Aware) | Prometheus + Grafana | Industry standard, native Kubernetes support, highly customizable.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.