Zero of fourteen models named openDCIM first on the direct prompt; two named Hyperview. openDCIM was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Hyperview by fourteen and openDCIM carries 20 labels and Hyperview 38, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data center infrastructure management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, openDCIM and Hyperview were named in the same answer fifty-six times, of the 92 answers naming openDCIM and the 107 naming Hyperview. In those answers Hyperview took the first choice ten times and openDCIM thirteen.
| Model | DirectOP | ParaphraseOP | ComparativeOP | Budget-constrainedOP | Scale-constrainedOP | NegativeOP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | OP | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | OP | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | OP | OP | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | OP | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | OP | |||||
| Mistral Small | OP | OP | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | OP | OP | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | OP | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | OP | OP | ||||
| Kimi K2 | OP | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | OP | OP | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | OP | OP | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | OP |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Has multiple critical security vulnerabilities... Requires extensive security hardening before production use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open-source solutions like OpenDCIM may carry higher risks for large enterprise operations due to potential security vulnerabilities, limited support, and development sustainability concerns.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“*Use with caution* ... Generally seen as outdated and feature-poor” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“openDCIM is recommended for focused rack and asset inventory on a limited budget, and is available for free under GPLv3” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best DCIM tool is openDCIM (free, open‑source) or NetBox (also free/self‑hosted)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“the best DCIM option is usually openDCIM if you can handle some DIY setup and support” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid commercial tools (e.g., Sunbird, Hyperview, or Device42)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Hyperview is the faster path to operational visibility, best for mid-market data center operations prioritizing fast time-to-value and transparent pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Hyperview is the best default choice if you want cloud delivery, quick deployment, and predictable costs” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“Hyperview is the most explicitly positioned for mid-market with fast deployment and $3/asset/yr pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.