Zero of fourteen models named openDCIM first on the direct prompt; four named Device42. openDCIM was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Device42 by fourteen and openDCIM carries 20 labels and Device42 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data center infrastructure management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, openDCIM and Device42 were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 92 answers naming openDCIM and the 178 naming Device42. In those answers Device42 took the first choice one time and openDCIM eleven.
| Model | DirectOP | ParaphraseOP | ComparativeOP | Budget-constrainedOP | Scale-constrainedOP | NegativeOP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | OP | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | OP | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | OP | OP | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | OP | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | OP | |||||
| Mistral Small | OP | OP | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | OP | OP | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | OP | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | OP | OP | ||||
| Kimi K2 | OP | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | OP | OP | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | OP | OP | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | OP |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Has multiple critical security vulnerabilities... Requires extensive security hardening before production use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open-source solutions like OpenDCIM may carry higher risks for large enterprise operations due to potential security vulnerabilities, limited support, and development sustainability concerns.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“*Use with caution* ... Generally seen as outdated and feature-poor” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“openDCIM is recommended for focused rack and asset inventory on a limited budget, and is available for free under GPLv3” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best DCIM tool is openDCIM (free, open‑source) or NetBox (also free/self‑hosted)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“the best DCIM option is usually openDCIM if you can handle some DIY setup and support” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Device42 and Leibert CRV iCOM have been found to be public-facing but secured only with default passwords” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid commercial tools (e.g., Sunbird, Hyperview, or Device42)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“consider higher-cost tools like Nlyte or Device42, but they're usually not the best "limited budget" choice” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Device42 or Sunbird DCIM offer the best balance of functionality, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and scalability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sunbird DCIM and Device42 are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Device42 (Strongest Overall for Mid-Market B2B)” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.