Zero of fourteen models named NetBox first on the direct prompt; zero named openDCIM. NetBox was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and openDCIM by thirteen and NetBox carries 33 labels and openDCIM 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data center infrastructure management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, NetBox and openDCIM were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 163 answers naming NetBox and the 92 naming openDCIM. In those answers openDCIM took the first choice ten times and NetBox thirty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | OP | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | OP | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | OP | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | OP | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | OP | |||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | OP | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | OP | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“NetBox and similar tools can work when engineering resources are available, but they are not a turnkey replacement” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Great for smaller B2B teams but lacks advanced monitoring/analytics... Not ideal if you need vendor support.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“but not a full facilities-monitoring DCIM platform” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Start with NetBox if you have technical staff who can manage it. It's the most capable and actively maintained free option” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“NetBox is almost certainly your best bet — it's free, powerful, and widely used” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Has multiple critical security vulnerabilities... Requires extensive security hardening before production use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open-source solutions like OpenDCIM may carry higher risks for large enterprise operations due to potential security vulnerabilities, limited support, and development sustainability concerns.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“*Use with caution* ... Generally seen as outdated and feature-poor” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“openDCIM is recommended for focused rack and asset inventory on a limited budget, and is available for free under GPLv3” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best DCIM tool is openDCIM (free, open‑source) or NetBox (also free/self‑hosted)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“the best DCIM option is usually openDCIM if you can handle some DIY setup and support” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.