Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › DCIM › NetBox vs openDCIM
Data center infrastructure management · November 2026 Edition

NetBox vs openDCIM

Zero of fourteen models named NetBox first on the direct prompt; zero named openDCIM. NetBox was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and openDCIM by thirteen and NetBox carries 33 labels and openDCIM 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

NetBox

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

openDCIM

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share16%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%25%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3320A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, NetBox reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Device42 was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Sunbird DCIM vs NetBox · Sunbird DCIM vs openDCIM · ManageEngine OpManager vs NetBox

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data center infrastructure management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
NetBoxFirst choices, of fourteen modelsopenDCIM
Direct001 against NetBox
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against NetBox
Budget-constrained97
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against NetBox · 5 against openDCIM
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, NetBox and openDCIM were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 163 answers naming NetBox and the 92 naming openDCIM. In those answers openDCIM took the first choice ten times and NetBox thirty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where NetBox and openDCIM stood in it.
ModelDirectOPParaphraseOPComparativeOPBudget-constrainedOPScale-constrainedOPNegativeOP
Claude Haiku 4.5OP
GPT-5.4 miniOP
Gemini 3.5 FlashOPOP
Perplexity SonarOP
Grok 4.20OP
Mistral SmallOPOP
DeepSeek V4 FlashOPOP
Llama 4 MaverickOP
Qwen 3.7 FlashOPOP
Kimi K2OP
GLM 4.7 FlashXOPOP
MiniMax M2.5OPOP
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30BOP
NetBoxOP openDCIM first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, NetBox on the left and openDCIM on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where NetBox and openDCIM stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashSunbird DCIM alternatives: Device42, Hyperview, NetBox, Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT
DeepSeek V4 FlashManageEngine OpManager, Sunbird DCIM alternatives: Device42, NetBox, Paessler PRTG
Qwen 3.7 FlashSunbird DCIM alternatives: Device42, Hyperview, NetBox
Kimi K2Sunbird DCIM alternatives: Device42, Hyperview, NetBox
GLM 4.7 FlashXDevice42, Sunbird dcTrack alternatives: Hyperview, NetBox, Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT
GPT-6 LunaSunbird DCIM alternatives: NetBox, Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT Advisor

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Hyperview, Sunbird DCIM
GPT-5.4 miniNlyte DCIM alternatives: Device42, OpManager Nexus, Sunbird DCIM
Perplexity SonarHyperview alternatives: Device42, Schneider EcoStruxure IT Advisor, Sunbird dcTrack
Grok 4.20Device42 alternatives: Hyperview DCIM, Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT
Mistral SmallDevice42, Sunbird DCIM alternatives: Nlyte DCIM, netTerrain DCIM
Llama 4 MaverickSunbird DCIM alternatives: Device42, EcoStruxure IT, Hyperview, NetZoom DCIM
MiniMax M2.5Device42, Sunbird DCIM alternatives: ManageEngine OpManager, Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT
Muse Glimmer 30BSunbird DCIM, dcTrack alternatives: Device42, Hyperview, ManageEngine OpManager, Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
NetBox leads by seventeen points.
NetBox41%#1 of 11
openDCIM24%#2 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
NetBox leads by four points.
NetBox16%#3 of 13
openDCIM12%#4 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
NetBox0%#– of 10
openDCIM0%#9 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about NetBox

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“NetBox and similar tools can work when engineering resources are available, but they are not a turnkey replacement” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Great for smaller B2B teams but lacks advanced monitoring/analytics... Not ideal if you need vendor support.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“but not a full facilities-monitoring DCIM platform” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Start with NetBox if you have technical staff who can manage it. It's the most capable and actively maintained free option” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“NetBox is almost certainly your best bet — it's free, powerful, and widely used” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about openDCIM

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Has multiple critical security vulnerabilities... Requires extensive security hardening before production use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open-source solutions like OpenDCIM may carry higher risks for large enterprise operations due to potential security vulnerabilities, limited support, and development sustainability concerns.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“*Use with caution* ... Generally seen as outdated and feature-poor” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“openDCIM is recommended for focused rack and asset inventory on a limited budget, and is available for free under GPLv3” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best DCIM tool is openDCIM (free, open‑source) or NetBox (also free/self‑hosted)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“the best DCIM option is usually openDCIM if you can handle some DIY setup and support” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.