Index › IT › Network and edge › SASE › Netskope One vs Cisco Secure Access
SASE platforms · November 2026 Edition

Netskope One vs Cisco Secure Access

Zero of fourteen models named Netskope One first on the direct prompt; one named Cisco Secure Access. Both were named by all fourteen models and Netskope One carries 44 labels and Cisco Secure Access 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Netskope One

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Cisco Secure Access

criticized challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate25%26%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4435A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Netskope One reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Fortinet FortiSASE was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Cato Networks vs Netskope One · Cato Networks vs Cisco Secure Access · Cloudflare One vs Netskope One

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SASE platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Netskope OneFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCisco Secure Access
Direct01
Paraphrase201 against Netskope One
Comparative10
Budget-constrained004 against Netskope One · 2 against Cisco Secure Access
Scale-constrained001 against Cisco Secure Access
Negative006 against Netskope One · 6 against Cisco Secure Access
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Netskope One and Cisco Secure Access were named in the same answer seventy-one times, of the 127 answers naming Netskope One and the 143 naming Cisco Secure Access. In those answers Cisco Secure Access took the first choice one time and Netskope One four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Netskope One and Cisco Secure Access stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Netskope One Cisco Secure Access first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Netskope One on the left and Cisco Secure Access on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Netskope One and Cisco Secure Access stood in it.

Cisco Secure Access first, Netskope One not the choice

1 of 14 modelsNetskope One was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXCisco Catalyst SD-WAN, Cisco Secure Access alternatives: Cato Networks, Fortinet FortiSASE, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniFortinet FortiSASE alternatives: Cato Networks, Cisco Secure Access, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Perplexity SonarCato SASE Cloud alternatives: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Grok 4.20Cato Networks' Cato SASE Cloud alternatives: Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Mistral SmallCato Networks alternatives: Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
DeepSeek V4 FlashCato Networks alternatives: Cisco Secure Access, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One
Kimi K2Cato Networks alternatives: Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One
MiniMax M2.5Cato Networks alternatives: Cisco Secure Access, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
GPT-6 LunaCato Networks alternatives: Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Muse Glimmer 30BCato Networks Cato SASE Cloud alternatives: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco Secure Access, Cisco Umbrella, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cato SASE Cloud alternatives: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco Umbrella, Fortinet FortiSASE
Gemini 3.5 FlashCato Networks alternatives: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE
Llama 4 MaverickCato Networks alternatives: Cloudflare One
Qwen 3.7 FlashCato Networks alternatives: Cloudflare One, Prisma Access, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Netskope One0%#10 of 12
Cisco Secure Access0%#9 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Netskope One leads by two points.
Netskope One4%#4 of 10
Cisco Secure Access2%#6 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Netskope One6%#6 of 9
Cisco Secure Access6%#7 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Netskope One

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Netskope | Higher-tier pricing with add-ons” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Top-tier Security Service Edge (SSE) platforms (like Zscaler or Netskope) excel at web and data security, but if you need a true single-vendor SASE platform, check their SD-WAN capabilities carefully.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Netskope was inaccessible to the testers... also price Cato's deployment and Netskope's licensing carefully.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd usually recommend Netskope One SASE as the default starting point” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Netskope ONE as the primary SASE solution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“start with Cato, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks, and Zscaler” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Cisco Secure Access

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“the combination of low independent test effectiveness scores and the elevated ransomware entry-vector risk is a common reason for caution” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rebadging concerns: Questions about whether it's truly integrated or just "re-badged Umbrella with extra steps"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some practitioners consider Cisco Umbrella a "legacy option" rather than a true SASE platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“1. Cisco Secure Access + Catalyst SD-WAN — Best Overall” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“if you have an existing Cisco environment or need strong enterprise integration, Cisco Secure Access would be more suitable” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
“Small business needing the lowest per-seat cost: Cisco Umbrella from $2-4/user/month is the cheapest listed SASE/SSE” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.