One of fourteen models named Palo Alto Networks NGFW first on the direct prompt; zero named Sophos Firewall. Both were named by all fourteen models and Palo Alto Networks NGFW carries 59 labels and Sophos Firewall 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the next-generation firewalls page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Palo Alto Networks NGFW and Sophos Firewall were named in the same answer eighty-five times, of the 164 answers naming Palo Alto Networks NGFW and the 113 naming Sophos Firewall. In those answers Sophos Firewall took the first choice six times and Palo Alto Networks NGFW twenty-four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid high-end like Palo Alto or full Cisco Secure Firewall unless scaled down” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Palo Alto Networks if budget is your primary constraint” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Typically higher hardware and subscription costs. More complex management (Panorama) and steeper learning curve. Overkill for many mid‑size B2B organizations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“Fortinet and Palo Alto are the most common choices — Fortinet for price-performance, Palo Alto for maximum security effectiveness and control” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“strongest reputation for security depth, threat prevention, and a broad platform approach centered on AI-driven inspection and Zero Trust” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Market leader, known for strong AI/ML threat detection... Palo Alto, Fortinet, and Check Point are generally considered the top leaders” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“some Check Point and Sophos models rated only "limited value,"” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sophos XGS in large environments ... Cautious adoption” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Sophos Firewall or Fortinet FortiGate as they offer the best balance of performance, features, ease of management, and cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Sophos if you are an SMB or mid-sized enterprise looking for an affordable, easy-to-manage firewall” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Mid-market organizations and MSPs (Managed Service Providers); those wanting AI-driven automation.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.