Zero of fourteen models named AWS Elastic Load Balancing first on the direct prompt; two named AWS Application Load Balancer. AWS Elastic Load Balancing was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and AWS Application Load Balancer by ten and AWS Elastic Load Balancing carries 34 labels and AWS Application Load Balancer 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the load balancers page.
| Model | DirectAEAA | ParaphraseAEAA | ComparativeAEAA | Budget-constrainedAEAA | Scale-constrainedAEAA | NegativeAEAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | AA | AE | AE | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | AA | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | AA | AE | AE | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | AE | AE | AE | AA | ||
| Grok 4.20 | AE | AE | AE | AE | ||
| Mistral Small | AE | AE | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | AE | AE | AE | AE | AE | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | AE | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | AE | AA | AE | |||
| Kimi K2 | AE | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | AE | AA | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | AA | AA | AE | AE | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | AA | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | AE | AE | AA |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Internet-facing AWS ALB/NLB or similar cloud LBs when they should be internal: A very common misconfiguration exposes backend services publicly.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“may be overkill unless you're already using those cloud platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Companies fully committed to AWS (but creates vendor lock-in)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Fully in AWS/Azure/GCP: Stick to native cloud load balancers (AWS ALB/NLB, Azure ALB, GCP Cloud LB). It minimizes overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“1 | AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ALB/NLB/GWLB) | Cloud-native (AWS) | AWS-centric apps, microservices, containers” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“often recommended as the top choice for small businesses because it offers a free tier” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“AWS ALB is unsuitable for workloads requiring L4 forwarding, ultra-low-latency pass-through, or non-HTTP protocols; use NLB or the appropriate L4 service instead.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“ALB is not the right choice when the workload is non-HTTP (use NLB)” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with AWS ALB or Azure Load Balancer (depending on your cloud provider)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“AWS-centric company: AWS Application Load Balancer for web apps” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Cloud-first, mostly HTTP(S) APIs, limited ops staff | AWS ALB, Azure Application Gateway, Google Cloud Load Balancing” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.