Zero of fourteen models named phpIPAM first on the direct prompt; zero named SolarWinds IP Address Manager. phpIPAM was named by twelve of the fourteen models and SolarWinds IP Address Manager by thirteen and phpIPAM carries 23 labels and SolarWinds IP Address Manager 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the DDI and IP address management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, phpIPAM and SolarWinds IP Address Manager were named in the same answer sixty-three times, of the 83 answers naming phpIPAM and the 111 naming SolarWinds IP Address Manager. In those answers SolarWinds IP Address Manager took the first choice fifteen times and phpIPAM sixteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Use phpIPAM only if you have a small network, strong in-house Linux skills, and can accept the trade-offs in automation and support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Open-source IPAM tools (e.g., unmaintained phpIPAM setups or custom GitHub wrappers) ... often lack automated sync features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“It lacks the built-in DHCP/DNS servers of commercial suites but manages addresses efficiently.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Highly recommended for budget-conscious teams, especially if you need a simple, flexible, and self-hosted IP address management tool.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“phpIPAM and NetBox Both are free and widely used as a best-value starting point for a small / limited-budget team.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“open-source solutions like phpIPAM or entry-level commercial options like SolarWinds tend to offer the best value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Scales poorly beyond a few thousand IPs ... AI models consistently rate it negatively” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“SolarWinds was compromised in the 2020 SUNBURST supply chain attack, and some models advise caution when using their products.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“More basic IPAM-focused solution, often for smaller environments” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“My top choice is SolarWinds® IP Address Manager, due to its extensive feature list, intuitive and integrated user interface” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best IP address management tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be SolarWinds IPAM or ManageEngine OpUtils.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“open-source solutions like phpIPAM or entry-level commercial options like SolarWinds tend to offer the best value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.