Zero of fourteen models named SolarWinds IP Address Manager first on the direct prompt; four named BlueCat Integrity. SolarWinds IP Address Manager was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and BlueCat Integrity by thirteen and SolarWinds IP Address Manager carries 39 labels and BlueCat Integrity 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the DDI and IP address management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, SolarWinds IP Address Manager and BlueCat Integrity were named in the same answer sixty-seven times, of the 111 answers naming SolarWinds IP Address Manager and the 174 naming BlueCat Integrity. In those answers BlueCat Integrity took the first choice eleven times and SolarWinds IP Address Manager eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Scales poorly beyond a few thousand IPs ... AI models consistently rate it negatively” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“SolarWinds was compromised in the 2020 SUNBURST supply chain attack, and some models advise caution when using their products.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“More basic IPAM-focused solution, often for smaller environments” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“My top choice is SolarWinds® IP Address Manager, due to its extensive feature list, intuitive and integrated user interface” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best IP address management tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be SolarWinds IPAM or ManageEngine OpUtils.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“open-source solutions like phpIPAM or entry-level commercial options like SolarWinds tend to offer the best value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“AI models suggest avoiding it unless necessary, as it may not be suitable for all business sizes.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“powerful but costly and likely overkill for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“BlueCat, for example, describes Micetro as an overlay and Integrity as a full-stack platform; those are different approaches with different tradeoffs.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose BlueCat (specifically Micetro) if you want a modern, cloud-ready platform that scales easily and offers high value per dollar—often the preferred choice for growing mid-market B2B entities.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“BlueCat (specifically BlueCat Integrity or their Address Manager with cloud options) is often the best overall DDI platform for a mid-market B2B company.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“BlueCat: Excels in stability, open standards, visibility, and centralized management. Often praised for security and ease in peer reviews.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.