Two of fourteen models named Make first on the direct prompt; two named Zapier. Make was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Zapier by twelve and Make carries 29 labels and Zapier 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow orchestration page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Make and Zapier were named in the same answer 143 times, of the 155 answers naming Make and the 201 naming Zapier. In those answers Zapier took the first choice eight times and Make twenty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“It's best avoided for complex or high-volume workflows.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Zapier, Make, or similar automation tools for high-volume, mission-critical processes” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“be cautious for complex, high-scale, or mission-critical orchestration” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The Best Overall (Visual & Complex Logic): Make (formerly Integromat) ... Make is currently the strongest contender.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“the top recommendation for most mid‑market B2B organizations is: Make (formerly Integromat)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Make is generally considered the best balance between power and cost for most businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid or be cautious with Zapier, Make, and Workato for anything beyond simple automation due to cost and scalability issues.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Zapier - It is consistently the most expensive per-task option unless you specifically need its massive 8,000+ app library.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“per-task pricing, limited durability, debugging constraints, and connector dependence can become problematic at scale” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“n8n (open-source, self-hosted) or Zapier (no-code, free tier) are the best starting points for workflow orchestration on a limited budget” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Zapier or Microsoft Power Automate” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Zapier (Best Overall for Most Mid-Market B2B Teams)” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.