Two of fourteen models named Make first on the direct prompt; two named Temporal. Make was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Temporal by fourteen and Make carries 29 labels and Temporal 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow orchestration page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Make and Temporal were named in the same answer forty times, of the 155 answers naming Make and the 115 naming Temporal. In those answers Temporal took the first choice two times and Make four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“It's best avoided for complex or high-volume workflows.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Zapier, Make, or similar automation tools for high-volume, mission-critical processes” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“be cautious for complex, high-scale, or mission-critical orchestration” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The Best Overall (Visual & Complex Logic): Make (formerly Integromat) ... Make is currently the strongest contender.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“the top recommendation for most mid‑market B2B organizations is: Make (formerly Integromat)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Make is generally considered the best balance between power and cost for most businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid: Proprietary paid tools like Temporal Cloud or heavy enterprise suites until you have budget for them.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Temporal - It is not recommended unless you're building a complex, long-running distributed system and have a dedicated DevOps/infrastructure team.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“Emerging/niche tools (e.g., Kestra, Temporal): Generally positive, but watch for immaturity” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Winner: Temporal ... is the industry standard for developer-centric durable execution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually Temporal” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for reliable, durable execution of complex business logic or microservices... has a steeper learning curve.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.