Index › IT › Data platform › Vector databases › Qdrant vs Weaviate
Vector databases · November 2026 Edition

Qdrant vs Weaviate

Six of fourteen models named Qdrant first on the direct prompt; one named Weaviate. Both were named by all fourteen models and Qdrant carries 73 labels and Weaviate 60, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Qdrant

endorsed leader

Named in one category this edition.

Weaviate

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share34%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate1%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels7360A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Qdrant reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Pinecone was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Qdrant vs pgvector · Qdrant vs Pinecone · Qdrant vs Milvus

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the vector databases page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
QdrantFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWeaviate
Direct61
Paraphrase42
Comparative31
Budget-constrained604 against Weaviate
Scale-constrained30
Negative301 against Qdrant · 3 against Weaviate
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Qdrant and Weaviate were named in the same answer 170 times, of the 215 answers naming Qdrant and the 183 naming Weaviate. In those answers Weaviate took the first choice seven times and Qdrant forty-nine.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Qdrant and Weaviate stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Qdrant Weaviate first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Qdrant on the left and Weaviate on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Qdrant and Weaviate stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
MiniMax M2.5Qdrant, Weaviate alternatives: Milvus, Pinecone, pgvector

Qdrant first, Weaviate an alternative

5 of 14 modelsWeaviate was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Qdrant alternatives: MongoDB Atlas Vector Search, Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector
Gemini 3.5 FlashPinecone, Qdrant alternatives: Weaviate, pgvector
Grok 4.20Qdrant alternatives: Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector
Llama 4 MaverickQdrant alternatives: Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector
GPT-6 LunaQdrant alternatives: Pinecone, pgvector

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniPinecone alternatives: Qdrant, Weaviate, pgvector
Perplexity Sonarpgvector alternatives: Pinecone, Qdrant
Mistral SmallPinecone alternatives: Qdrant, Weaviate, pgvector
DeepSeek V4 Flashpgvector alternatives: Pinecone, Qdrant
Qwen 3.7 Flashpgvector alternatives: Pinecone, Qdrant
Kimi K2pgvector alternatives: Pinecone, Qdrant
GLM 4.7 FlashXPinecone alternatives: Milvus, Qdrant, Weaviate
Muse Glimmer 30BPinecone, pgvector alternatives: Milvus, Qdrant, Weaviate

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Qdrant leads by twenty-five points.
Qdrant29%#2 of 9
Weaviate4%#4 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Qdrant leads by twenty-nine points.
Qdrant34%#1 of 11
Weaviate5%#4 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Qdrant leads by seven points.
Qdrant20%#2 of 13
Weaviate13%#3 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Qdrant

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“reported with a serious flaw in the same round up” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Filtering is where Qdrant stands out — the database supports rich JSON-based filters that integrate with vector search efficiently. This makes it ideal for B2B use cases requiring complex filtering.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Qdrant consistently receives the most favorable reviews across testing ... If you need a dedicated vector database, it's often the safer choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Most teams should evaluate Qdrant (for performance and flexibility) or Weaviate (for AI-native features) as their primary options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Weaviate

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid on a Budget ... Weaviate — More complex to set up and resource-intensive” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Managed Weaviate — $25–45/month minimums plus hidden infrastructure costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Running a dedicated service (like Weaviate, Pinecone, or Qdrant) alongside your primary database increases infrastructure costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most teams should evaluate Qdrant (for performance and flexibility) or Weaviate (for AI-native features) as their primary options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Weaviate or Qdrant offer the best balance of cost, performance, and flexibility” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“we often recommend starting with a specialized open-source solution like Weaviate (using their cloud tier)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.