Index › IT › Data platform › Proxy and web data › Oxylabs vs Proxy-Cheap
Proxy and web data providers · November 2026 Edition

Oxylabs vs Proxy-Cheap

One of fourteen models named Oxylabs first on the direct prompt; zero named Proxy-Cheap. Oxylabs was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Proxy-Cheap by nine and Oxylabs carries 58 labels and Proxy-Cheap 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Oxylabs

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Proxy-Cheap

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate24%33%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5812A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Oxylabs reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Decodo was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Decodo vs Oxylabs · Decodo vs Proxy-Cheap · Webshare vs Oxylabs

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the proxy and web data providers page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OxylabsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProxy-Cheap
Direct102 against Oxylabs
Paraphrase002 against Oxylabs
Comparative60
Budget-constrained013 against Oxylabs
Scale-constrained00
Negative207 against Oxylabs · 4 against Proxy-Cheap
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Oxylabs and Proxy-Cheap were named in the same answer twenty-five times, of the 179 answers naming Oxylabs and the 36 naming Proxy-Cheap. In those answers Proxy-Cheap took the first choice four times and Oxylabs five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Oxylabs and Proxy-Cheap stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Oxylabs Proxy-Cheap first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Oxylabs on the left and Proxy-Cheap on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Oxylabs and Proxy-Cheap stood in it.

Oxylabs first, Proxy-Cheap not the choice

1 of 14 modelsProxy-Cheap was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniBright Data, Oxylabs alternatives: NetNut, Smartproxy, Zyte API

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Decodo alternatives: NetNut, Oxylabs
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmartproxy alternatives: Bright Data, IPRoyal, NetNut, Oxylabs
Perplexity SonarDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, SOAX
DeepSeek V4 FlashDecodo alternatives: IPRoyal, Infatica, Oxylabs, Proxidize, SOAX
Llama 4 MaverickDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, Smartproxy, Webshare
Qwen 3.7 FlashSmartproxy alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs, Webshare
MiniMax M2.5Decodo alternatives: Oxylabs, Proxidize, Smartproxy, Webshare
GPT-6 LunaDecodo alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs
Muse Glimmer 30BDecodo alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs, Proxidize, Smartproxy

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.20Decodo alternatives: DataImpulse, IPRoyal, Proxidize, SOAX
Mistral SmallDecodo alternatives: DataImpulse, Proxidize, Proxyrack, Rayobyte
Kimi K2Decodo, Smartproxy alternatives: DataImpulse, SOAX
GLM 4.7 FlashXDataImpulse, Decodo alternatives: IPRoyal, SOAX

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Proxy-Cheap leads by four points.
Proxy-Cheap4%#7 of 8
Oxylabs0%#8 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Oxylabs2%#5 of 13
Proxy-Cheap2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Oxylabs leads at enterprise.
Oxylabs36%#2 of 7
Proxy-Cheap2%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Oxylabs

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid premium providers like Oxylabs and Bright Data unless you have a larger budget” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Budgets: Premium providers like Bright Data or Oxylabs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Reddit sued them in October 2025, alleging involvement in unauthorized scraping of Reddit comments... treat this as a reason for careful legal and sourcing review” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Safer Alternatives (For Reference) - Oxylabs: Ethically sourced through Honeygain partnership with informed consent” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“consider a single vendor that spans all three layers (Bright Data, Oxylabs) to simplify integration and compliance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Oxylabs | Business-grade performance, strong infrastructure | 100M+ IPs | High-volume business scraping” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Proxy-Cheap

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“avoid or be extra cautious with any proxy/web data provider that shows repeated patterns of complaints... include Proxy-Cheap, IPFoxy, B2Proxy, and Proxiware” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why Avoid: Their proxies are often identified as low-quality or previously compromised by target websites” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Has a high negative rate (57%) and is flagged for issues such as fake reviews and transparency problems.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Proxy-Cheap is called out as the overall best choice for its balance of price, performance and flexibility.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Proxy-Cheap — massive IP pool with flexible pay-as-you-go pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
“Proxy‑Cheap – “Ultra‑low per‑IP cost, no setup fee”” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.