Index › IT › Data platform › Proxy and web data › IPRoyal vs Proxy-Cheap
Proxy and web data providers · November 2026 Edition

IPRoyal vs Proxy-Cheap

Zero of fourteen models named IPRoyal first on the direct prompt; zero named Proxy-Cheap. IPRoyal was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Proxy-Cheap by nine and IPRoyal carries 37 labels and Proxy-Cheap 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

IPRoyal

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Proxy-Cheap

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%33%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3712A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, IPRoyal reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Decodo was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Decodo vs IPRoyal · Decodo vs Proxy-Cheap · Webshare vs IPRoyal

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the proxy and web data providers page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
IPRoyalFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProxy-Cheap
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained11
Scale-constrained00
Negative104 against IPRoyal · 4 against Proxy-Cheap
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, IPRoyal and Proxy-Cheap were named in the same answer twenty-four times, of the 103 answers naming IPRoyal and the 36 naming Proxy-Cheap. In those answers Proxy-Cheap took the first choice two times and IPRoyal one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where IPRoyal and Proxy-Cheap stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
IPRoyal Proxy-Cheap first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, IPRoyal on the left and Proxy-Cheap on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where IPRoyal and Proxy-Cheap stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmartproxy alternatives: Bright Data, IPRoyal, NetNut, Oxylabs
Grok 4.20Decodo alternatives: DataImpulse, IPRoyal, Proxidize, SOAX
DeepSeek V4 FlashDecodo alternatives: IPRoyal, Infatica, Oxylabs, Proxidize, SOAX
GLM 4.7 FlashXDataImpulse, Decodo alternatives: IPRoyal, SOAX

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Decodo alternatives: NetNut, Oxylabs
GPT-5.4 miniBright Data, Oxylabs alternatives: NetNut, Smartproxy, Zyte API
Perplexity SonarDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, SOAX
Mistral SmallDecodo alternatives: DataImpulse, Proxidize, Proxyrack, Rayobyte
Llama 4 MaverickDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, Smartproxy, Webshare
Qwen 3.7 FlashSmartproxy alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs, Webshare
Kimi K2Decodo, Smartproxy alternatives: DataImpulse, SOAX
MiniMax M2.5Decodo alternatives: Oxylabs, Proxidize, Smartproxy, Webshare
GPT-6 LunaDecodo alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs
Muse Glimmer 30BDecodo alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs, Proxidize, Smartproxy

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
IPRoyal leads by six points.
IPRoyal9%#3 of 8
Proxy-Cheap4%#7 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
IPRoyal2%#7 of 13
Proxy-Cheap2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Proxy-Cheap leads at enterprise.
Proxy-Cheap2%#– of 7
IPRoyal0%#7 of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about IPRoyal

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Removed from some recommendation lists due to concerns about fake reviews and transparency issues.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why Caution is Advised: If you require strict vendor audits or clear documentation of their practices for compliance (GDPR/SOC2), this lack of transparency makes them a poor fit.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution. ... the proxy quality is poor—causing account bans” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“MarsProxies or IPRoyal offer the best balance of price, features, and reliability” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“IPRoyal (strong reviews, ethical sourcing, good value at ~$1.75–$7/GB)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Frequently top-rated for value; large global pool, hands-on support, and flexible pricing” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · alternative

What the models said about Proxy-Cheap

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“avoid or be extra cautious with any proxy/web data provider that shows repeated patterns of complaints... include Proxy-Cheap, IPFoxy, B2Proxy, and Proxiware” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why Avoid: Their proxies are often identified as low-quality or previously compromised by target websites” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Has a high negative rate (57%) and is flagged for issues such as fake reviews and transparency problems.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Proxy-Cheap is called out as the overall best choice for its balance of price, performance and flexibility.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Proxy-Cheap — massive IP pool with flexible pay-as-you-go pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
“Proxy‑Cheap – “Ultra‑low per‑IP cost, no setup fee”” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.