Zero of fourteen models named Redis first on the direct prompt; zero named Azure Cosmos DB. Redis was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Azure Cosmos DB by twelve and Redis carries 56 labels and Azure Cosmos DB 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the nosql databases page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Redis and Azure Cosmos DB were named in the same answer fifty-four times, of the 152 answers naming Redis and the 103 naming Azure Cosmos DB. In those answers Azure Cosmos DB took the first choice four times and Redis one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid Redis as a sole data store for critical financial data.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Redis as the only copy of important data — Don't assume data is durable just because it's in a database.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Redis is rarely used as a *primary* database for storage due to cost constraints and lack of durability” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Redis for a key-value database” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For caching, real-time, or session store: Redis (via ElastiCache or Redis Cloud) is almost always the right answer.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · alternative
“In-Memory / Fast Key-Value | Redis Enterprise, Dragonfly | Caching, session stores, real-time leaderboards.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid managed enterprise tiers (DynamoDB, Cosmos DB, etc.)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“over managed cloud services like MongoDB Atlas, DynamoDB, or Cosmos DB — the latter can incur unexpected costs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Proprietary APIs (DynamoDB, Cosmos DB) make migration difficult.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“lean toward a managed, cloud-specific solution (like DynamoDB or Cosmos DB)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose it when Microsoft Azure, globally distributed deployment, or multi-region consistency options are central requirements.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“Cloud-Native / Managed Key-Value | AWS DynamoDB, Azure Cosmos DB | Zero-maintenance, seamless cloud integration” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.