Fourteen of fourteen models named MongoDB first on the direct prompt; zero named Azure Cosmos DB. MongoDB was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Azure Cosmos DB by twelve and MongoDB carries 82 labels and Azure Cosmos DB 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the nosql databases page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, MongoDB and Azure Cosmos DB were named in the same answer ninety-one times, of the 243 answers naming MongoDB and the 103 naming Azure Cosmos DB. In those answers Azure Cosmos DB took the first choice five times and MongoDB fifty-two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid MongoDB if you need multi-document ACID transactions” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“MongoDB: Do not casually trust deployment defaults... choose read and write concerns deliberately, define schemas in application code” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“over managed cloud services like MongoDB Atlas, DynamoDB, or Cosmos DB — the latter can incur unexpected costs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“MongoDB Atlas is the default first choice for mid-market B2B because of flexible document model, strong developer experience and multi-cloud portability.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“MongoDB remains one of the most popular document-based NoSQL databases, offering scalability, flexibility, and strong indexing capabilities.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“MongoDB Atlas is a strong default for mid-sized B2B use cases such as CRM pipelines, customer profiles, product catalogs and content feeds” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid managed enterprise tiers (DynamoDB, Cosmos DB, etc.)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“over managed cloud services like MongoDB Atlas, DynamoDB, or Cosmos DB — the latter can incur unexpected costs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Proprietary APIs (DynamoDB, Cosmos DB) make migration difficult.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“lean toward a managed, cloud-specific solution (like DynamoDB or Cosmos DB)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose it when Microsoft Azure, globally distributed deployment, or multi-region consistency options are central requirements.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“Cloud-Native / Managed Key-Value | AWS DynamoDB, Azure Cosmos DB | Zero-maintenance, seamless cloud integration” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.