Two of fourteen models named Amazon DynamoDB first on the direct prompt; zero named PostgreSQL. Amazon DynamoDB was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and PostgreSQL by eight and Amazon DynamoDB carries 65 labels and PostgreSQL 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the nosql databases page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Amazon DynamoDB and PostgreSQL were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 208 answers naming Amazon DynamoDB and the 99 naming PostgreSQL. In those answers PostgreSQL took the first choice eight times and Amazon DynamoDB three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“AI models and experts often advise avoiding DynamoDB as a primary application database unless your use case is a perfect fit for key-value patterns.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid managed enterprise tiers (DynamoDB, Cosmos DB, etc.)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“DynamoDB (but model your access patterns rigidly upfront)... DynamoDB's provisioned mode can be cheap or catastrophically expensive if misconfigured.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative
“lean toward a managed, cloud-specific solution (like DynamoDB or Cosmos DB), even with the potential lock-in” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“MongoDB (as a managed service like MongoDB Atlas) or Amazon DynamoDB would be my top recommendations” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a key-value database service, Amazon DynamoDB is the most frequently recommended option.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Use PostgreSQL + JSONB if you're early-stage and want maximum flexibility with minimal cost.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best "All-in-One" Alternative: PostgreSQL (with JSONB)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“TL;DR: Default to Postgres. Reach for NoSQL only when you can state the specific access pattern or scale wall that forces it.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.