Index › IT › Data platform › AI governance › Holistic AI vs Fiddler AI
AI governance platforms · November 2026 Edition

Holistic AI vs Fiddler AI

Zero of fourteen models named Holistic AI first on the direct prompt; zero named Fiddler AI. Holistic AI was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Fiddler AI by ten and Holistic AI carries 31 labels and Fiddler AI 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Holistic AI

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Fiddler AI

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate13%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3120A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Holistic AI reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Credo AI was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Credo AI vs Holistic AI · Credo AI vs Fiddler AI · dope.security vs Holistic AI

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI governance platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Holistic AIFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFiddler AI
Direct00
Paraphrase001 against Holistic AI
Comparative00
Budget-constrained011 against Holistic AI
Scale-constrained10
Negative002 against Holistic AI · 1 against Fiddler AI
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Holistic AI and Fiddler AI were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 73 answers naming Holistic AI and the 69 naming Fiddler AI. In those answers Fiddler AI took the first choice one time and Holistic AI zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Holistic AI and Fiddler AI stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Holistic AI Fiddler AI first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Holistic AI on the left and Fiddler AI on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Holistic AI and Fiddler AI stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Credo AI alternatives: Govern365, Holistic AI, Walled AI
Gemini 3.5 FlashCredo AI alternatives: Fiddler AI, ModelOp Center, Trustible, Vanta
Grok 4.20Microsoft Purview alternatives: Credo AI, Drata, Holistic AI, Vanta, dope.security
DeepSeek V4 FlashVanta alternatives: Credo AI, Govarna, Holistic AI

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCredo AI alternatives: IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governance
Perplexity SonarCredo AI alternatives: AWS SageMaker AI Governance, Govarna, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI Governance, Speakeasy
Mistral SmallGovarna alternatives: Govern365, dope.security
Llama 4 Maverickdope.security alternatives: Cakewalk, Govern365, Pillar Security
Qwen 3.7 FlashGovarna alternatives: Credo AI, Govern365, dope.security
Kimi K2Govarna alternatives: Vanta
GLM 4.7 FlashXGovern365 alternatives: IBM watsonx.governance, dope.security
MiniMax M2.5Credo AI alternatives: Drata, Govarna, IBM watsonx.governance
GPT-6 LunaTrustible alternatives: Credo AI, OneTrust AI Governance
Muse Glimmer 30BStrac, dope.security alternatives: Credo AI, Govarna, IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governance

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Holistic AI0%#12 of 12
Fiddler AI0%#11 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Holistic AI2%#6 of 10
Fiddler AI2%#7 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Holistic AI0%#9 of 11
Fiddler AI0%#7 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Holistic AI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Enterprise-only platforms (OneTrust, Holistic AI, ModelOp) – typically $30K–$150K+/year” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · hard negative
“capabilities or compliance claims have not been independently verified; this is explicitly flagged for Credo AI, Holistic AI, ServiceNow, and others” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Both have high negative rates (17% and 16% respectively), which may reflect issues with functionality, support, or integration.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Purpose-built AI Governance | Credo AI, Trustible, Enzai, Holistic AI | Usually the best fit.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Holistic AI provides bias auditing, risk management, and compliance in one platform with strong technical depth without enterprise complexity” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
“Offers deeper automated technical testing (bias, hallucinations, toxicity) than most competitors while still covering policy/compliance.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative

What the models said about Fiddler AI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Both have high negative rates (17% and 16% respectively), which may reflect issues with functionality, support, or integration.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best Choice: Openlayer or Fiddler AI” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Fiddler or Arize when the immediate problem is production monitoring, LLM evaluation, tracing, or agent observability.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Fiddler AI if your team needs deep technical insights into model behavior, drift, and explainability during production.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.