Index › IT › Identity and access › Identity verification › Veriff vs iDenfy
Identity verification · November 2026 Edition

Veriff vs iDenfy

Zero of fourteen models named Veriff first on the direct prompt; two named iDenfy. Veriff was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and iDenfy by twelve and Veriff carries 43 labels and iDenfy 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Veriff

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

iDenfy

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4321A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Veriff reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sumsub was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Sumsub vs Veriff · Sumsub vs iDenfy · Persona vs Veriff

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity verification page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
VeriffFirst choices, of fourteen modelsiDenfy
Direct02
Paraphrase40
Comparative11
Budget-constrained141 against Veriff
Scale-constrained10
Negative002 against Veriff
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Veriff and iDenfy were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 132 answers naming Veriff and the 67 naming iDenfy. In those answers iDenfy took the first choice sixteen times and Veriff ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Veriff and iDenfy stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Veriff iDenfy first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Veriff on the left and iDenfy on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Veriff and iDenfy stood in it.

iDenfy first, Veriff not the choice

2 of 14 modelsVeriff was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashiDenfy alternatives: ComplyCube, Middesk, Persona
GLM 4.7 FlashXComplyCube, iDenfy alternatives: Jumio, Sumsub

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Trulioo alternatives: Middesk, Persona, Sumsub, iDenfy
GPT-5.4 miniSumsub alternatives: Entrust IDV, Trulioo, Veriff
Perplexity SonarTrulioo alternatives: Middesk, Persona, Sumsub, Veriff
Kimi K2Persona, Sumsub alternatives: Trustpair, Veriff
Muse Glimmer 30BSumsub alternatives: Persona, Trulioo, Veriff

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashPersona alternatives: Middesk, Sumsub
Grok 4.20Shufti Pro alternatives: Persona, Socure
Mistral SmallComplyCube, Sumsub alternatives: Persona
DeepSeek V4 FlashPersona, Sumsub alternatives: Alloy, Middesk
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
MiniMax M2.5Trustpair alternatives: Incode Technologies, Jumio, Socure, Sumsub
GPT-6 LunaPersona alternatives: Middesk

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
iDenfy leads by eight points.
iDenfy23%#1 of 10
Veriff15%#3 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Veriff11%#4 of 11
iDenfy11%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Veriff leads at enterprise.
Veriff12%#4 of 11
iDenfy4%#6 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Veriff

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Veriff (Trustpilot: ~1.3/5) - Users report the system frequently gets stuck at the selfie step” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Higher price point but reliable for businesses needing more robust verification” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Data breach exposing 8,583 Total Wireless customers; Vague rejection reasoning” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Given your size, Persona, 1Kosmos, or Veriff are strong starting points worth evaluating in a pilot.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Veriff as the default choice for document + selfie verification” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Veriff for broad international consumer onboarding and fraud prevention.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about iDenfy

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“iDenfy: Offers a true pay-per-approved model, with a starting price of $135/month and a cost per verification that is only billed for approved verifications.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Veriff Self-Serve (free trial) or iDenfy (low per-verification cost with success-based billing)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“iDenfy is the strongest default choice: it offers pay-per-success pricing, a free trial” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.