Index › IT › Identity and access › Identity verification › Didit vs Veriff
Identity verification · November 2026 Edition

Didit vs Veriff

Zero of fourteen models named Didit first on the direct prompt; zero named Veriff. Didit was named by ten of the fourteen models and Veriff by fourteen and Didit carries 11 labels and Veriff 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Didit

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Veriff

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share13%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1143A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Didit reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sumsub was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Sumsub vs Didit · Sumsub vs Veriff · Persona vs Didit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity verification page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DiditFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVeriff
Direct00
Paraphrase04
Comparative01
Budget-constrained711 against Veriff
Scale-constrained01
Negative002 against Veriff
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Didit and Veriff were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 27 answers naming Didit and the 132 naming Veriff. In those answers Veriff took the first choice three times and Didit eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Didit and Veriff stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Didit Veriff first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Didit on the left and Veriff on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Didit and Veriff stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniSumsub alternatives: Entrust IDV, Trulioo, Veriff
Perplexity SonarTrulioo alternatives: Middesk, Persona, Sumsub, Veriff
Kimi K2Persona, Sumsub alternatives: Trustpair, Veriff
Muse Glimmer 30BSumsub alternatives: Persona, Trulioo, Veriff

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Trulioo alternatives: Middesk, Persona, Sumsub, iDenfy
Gemini 3.5 FlashPersona alternatives: Middesk, Sumsub
Grok 4.20Shufti Pro alternatives: Persona, Socure
Mistral SmallComplyCube, Sumsub alternatives: Persona
DeepSeek V4 FlashPersona, Sumsub alternatives: Alloy, Middesk
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashiDenfy alternatives: ComplyCube, Middesk, Persona
GLM 4.7 FlashXComplyCube, iDenfy alternatives: Jumio, Sumsub
MiniMax M2.5Trustpair alternatives: Incode Technologies, Jumio, Socure, Sumsub
GPT-6 LunaPersona alternatives: Middesk

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Veriff leads by two points.
Veriff15%#3 of 10
Didit12%#4 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Didit leads at mid-market.
Didit13%#3 of 11
Veriff11%#4 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Veriff leads at enterprise.
Veriff12%#4 of 11
Didit0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Didit

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with Didit if you have very limited volume (under 500 verifications/month) since it's genuinely free with no credit card required.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Didit is the practical cheapest. 500 free verifications/month forever, then $0.33 per full KYC with no contract or minimums is hard to beat” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Didit – Best Overall Value for Small Businesses ... Extremely low per-check cost (by far the cheapest among major providers).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Veriff

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Veriff (Trustpilot: ~1.3/5) - Users report the system frequently gets stuck at the selfie step” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Higher price point but reliable for businesses needing more robust verification” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Data breach exposing 8,583 Total Wireless customers; Vague rejection reasoning” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Given your size, Persona, 1Kosmos, or Veriff are strong starting points worth evaluating in a pilot.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Veriff as the default choice for document + selfie verification” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Veriff for broad international consumer onboarding and fraud prevention.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.