Sumsub vs Didit
Five of fourteen models named Sumsub first on the direct prompt; zero named Didit. Sumsub was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Didit by ten and Sumsub carries 46 labels and Didit 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity verification page.
By framing
SumsubFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDidit
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Sumsub Didit first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Sumsub on the left and Didit on the right.The direct prompt
Sumsub first, Didit not the choice
5 of 14 modelsDidit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Sumsub
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“One of the lowest-rated verification platforms - Constant rejection of valid verification documents” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“independent testing flagged a fraud trade-off: Sumsub accepted 80% of fake documents in KYC AML Guide testing, the highest rate in the pool” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“often outperforming pricier options like Jumio, Onfido, or Sumsub in value” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Sumsub stands out as a comprehensive solution, offering both robust KYC document verification and advanced selfie verification” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sumsub and ComplyCube are the top choices due to their strong compliance features, scalability, and positive user reviews” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I recommend Sumsub as the top choice for a mid-sized B2B company needing robust KYC document and selfie verification.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Didit
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Start with Didit if you have very limited volume (under 500 verifications/month) since it's genuinely free with no credit card required.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Didit is the practical cheapest. 500 free verifications/month forever, then $0.33 per full KYC with no contract or minimums is hard to beat” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Didit – Best Overall Value for Small Businesses ... Extremely low per-check cost (by far the cheapest among major providers).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.