Index › IT › Identity and access › Identity verification › Didit vs Trulioo
Identity verification · November 2026 Edition

Didit vs Trulioo

Zero of fourteen models named Didit first on the direct prompt; two named Trulioo. Didit was named by ten of the fourteen models and Trulioo by thirteen and Didit carries 11 labels and Trulioo 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Didit

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Trulioo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share13%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1127A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Didit reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sumsub was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Sumsub vs Didit · Sumsub vs Trulioo · Persona vs Didit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity verification page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DiditFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTrulioo
Direct021 against Trulioo
Paraphrase01
Comparative00
Budget-constrained70
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Didit and Trulioo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Didit Trulioo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Didit on the left and Trulioo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Didit and Trulioo stood in it.

Trulioo first, Didit not the choice

2 of 14 modelsDidit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Trulioo alternatives: Middesk, Persona, Sumsub, iDenfy
Perplexity SonarTrulioo alternatives: Middesk, Persona, Sumsub, Veriff

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniSumsub alternatives: Entrust IDV, Trulioo, Veriff
Muse Glimmer 30BSumsub alternatives: Persona, Trulioo, Veriff

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashPersona alternatives: Middesk, Sumsub
Grok 4.20Shufti Pro alternatives: Persona, Socure
Mistral SmallComplyCube, Sumsub alternatives: Persona
DeepSeek V4 FlashPersona, Sumsub alternatives: Alloy, Middesk
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashiDenfy alternatives: ComplyCube, Middesk, Persona
Kimi K2Persona, Sumsub alternatives: Trustpair, Veriff
GLM 4.7 FlashXComplyCube, iDenfy alternatives: Jumio, Sumsub
MiniMax M2.5Trustpair alternatives: Incode Technologies, Jumio, Socure, Sumsub
GPT-6 LunaPersona alternatives: Middesk

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Didit leads by eight points.
Didit12%#4 of 10
Trulioo4%#7 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Didit leads by eight points.
Didit13%#3 of 11
Trulioo6%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Trulioo leads at enterprise.
Trulioo8%#5 of 11
Didit0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Didit

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with Didit if you have very limited volume (under 500 verifications/month) since it's genuinely free with no credit card required.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Didit is the practical cheapest. 500 free verifications/month forever, then $0.33 per full KYC with no contract or minimums is hard to beat” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Didit – Best Overall Value for Small Businesses ... Extremely low per-check cost (by far the cheapest among major providers).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Trulioo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Higher entry point than pure self-serve tools, but offers deep global reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Trulioo is a data-first identity verification platform with particularly strong global coverage for both individuals and businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The best KYC document and selfie verification tool for a mid-sized B2B company is Trulioo, Veriff, Identomat, or Yoti.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Trulioo is the strongest default choice” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.