Identity governance · November 2026 Edition
Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Corma
Four of fourteen models named Microsoft Entra ID Governance first on the direct prompt; two named Corma. Microsoft Entra ID Governance was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Corma by eight and Microsoft Entra ID Governance carries 58 labels and Corma 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share30%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels5810A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Entra ID Governance reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lumos was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Omada Identity · Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Lumos · Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs tenfold
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity governance page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Entra ID GovernanceFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCorma
Direct42
Paraphrase71
Comparative00
Budget-constrained50
Scale-constrained10
Negative003 against Microsoft Entra ID Governance
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Entra ID Governance and Corma stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Microsoft Entra ID Governance Corma first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Entra ID Governance on the left and Corma on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Entra ID Governance and Corma stood in it.
Microsoft Entra ID Governance first, Corma an alternative
4 of 14 modelsCorma was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashLumos, Microsoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: Okta Identity Governance, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Kimi K2Microsoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: Iden, Lumos, Okta Identity Governance, One Identity Manager
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: Corma, ObserveID, Okta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Corma first, Microsoft Entra ID Governance an alternative
2 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Entra ID Governance was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Corma alternatives: Lumos, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Pathlock, Zluri, tenfold
Muse Glimmer 30BCorma, Lumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Identity Governance, SSOJet, Zluri
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Omada Identity alternatives: ConductorOne, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, One Identity Manager, Zluri
Gemini 3.5 FlashConductorOne, Lumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Zilla Security, Zluri
Perplexity SonarOkta Identity Governance alternatives: Lumos, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager
Grok 4.20SailPoint IdentityIQ alternatives: C1, Corma, Lumos, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, Zilla Security
Mistral SmallSailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud alternatives: Corma, Lumos, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, tenfold
Qwen 3.7 FlashVeza alternatives: Cakewalk, Corma, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Omada Identity, Zluri
GPT-6 LunaC1 alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Identity Governance
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Entra ID Governance leads by twenty-five points.
Microsoft Entra ID Governance27%#1 of 14Corma2%#– of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Entra ID Governance leads by twenty-five points.
Microsoft Entra ID Governance30%#1 of 15Corma5%#7 of 15Enterprise
Corma is not named for this buyer.
Microsoft Entra ID Governance25%#2 of 9Corma—not namedWhat the models said about Microsoft Entra ID Governance
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Microsoft Entra ID Governance as a universal IGA replacement... governance for non-Microsoft, legacy, mainframe, ERP, and custom applications can be thinner” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Entra ID Governance if you need deep governance across a heterogeneous, legacy-heavy application estate.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“works well within its ecosystem but lacks depth for complex enterprise scenarios” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“affordable with domain-based licensing and unlimited objects, making it ideal if your organization is already Microsoft-centric” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one default recommendation for most mid-sized B2B firms, I'd lean Microsoft Entra ID Governance” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the default recommendation is Microsoft Entra ID Governance if your organization already uses Microsoft 365” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Corma
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Corma - Rated 5/5 for mid-market fit, specifically designed for EU-based mid-market companies with native GDPR compliance.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Corma - A converged SaaS Management Platform (SMP) and IAM solution built specifically for European mid-market IT teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Corma – EU-mid-market fit 5/5 ... Realistic deployment: under 30 days end-to-end for a 250-employee org.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Omada IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs LumosMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs tenfoldMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs Okta Identity GovernanceMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs IdenMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs SailPoint Identity Security CloudOmada Identity vs CormaLumos vs Cormatenfold vs CormaOkta Identity Governance vs CormaIden vs CormaCorma vs SailPoint Identity Security CloudAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full IGA standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.