Index › IT › Developer platform › Developer portals › Port vs Atlassian Compass
Internal developer portals · November 2026 Edition

Port vs Atlassian Compass

Ten of fourteen models named Port first on the direct prompt; zero named Atlassian Compass. Both were named by all fourteen models and Port carries 71 labels and Atlassian Compass 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Port

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

Atlassian Compass

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share57%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels7130A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Port reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Port vs Backstage · Port vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud · Port vs Roadie

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the internal developer portals page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PortFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAtlassian Compass
Direct100
Paraphrase90
Comparative40
Budget-constrained72
Scale-constrained201 against Atlassian Compass
Negative004 against Port · 4 against Atlassian Compass
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Port and Atlassian Compass were named in the same answer ninety-four times, of the 215 answers naming Port and the 97 naming Atlassian Compass. In those answers Atlassian Compass took the first choice five times and Port fifty-nine.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Port and Atlassian Compass stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Port Atlassian Compass first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Port on the left and Atlassian Compass on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Port and Atlassian Compass stood in it.

Port first, Atlassian Compass an alternative

10 of 14 modelsAtlassian Compass was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashPort alternatives: Atlassian Compass, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Roadie
Perplexity SonarPort alternatives: Atlassian Compass, Backstage, Humanitec, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Mistral SmallPort
DeepSeek V4 FlashPort alternatives: OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Llama 4 MaverickPort alternatives: Backstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashPort alternatives: Humanitec
Kimi K2Port alternatives: OpsLevel
GLM 4.7 FlashXPort alternatives: Backstage, Humanitec, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
GPT-6 LunaPort alternatives: Backstage, OpsLevel
Muse Glimmer 30BPort alternatives: Backstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniRoadie alternatives: Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
Grok 4.20Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud alternatives: OpsLevel, Port, Roadie

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
MiniMax M2.5OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud alternatives: Backstage, Harness IDP, Roadie

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Port leads by sixty-one points.
Port69%#1 of 7
Atlassian Compass7%#3 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Port leads by fifty-three points.
Port57%#1 of 8
Atlassian Compass4%#5 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Port leads by forty-two points.
Port44%#1 of 9
Atlassian Compass2%#8 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Port

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Proprietary Closed‑Source Portals (e.g., Port.io, OpsLevel, Atlassian Compass) | *Vendor lock‑in.*” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“you should carefully verify Port's compatibility with your infrastructure before committing fully” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“proprietary portals (Port.io, OpsLevel, Atlassian Compass, etc.) carry vendor lock-in risks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Port — Best Overall Value for Small-to-Mid Teams ... Port's free tier (up to 15 users) is the sweet spot between capability and cost.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Port is recommended for mid-sized B2B companies as it provides a good balance of time-to-value, governance, and mid-market pricing.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Port for balanced, quick-start portals with modern features like AI—often recommended as the "best for most teams"” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Atlassian Compass

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“I would not start a new evaluation with Atlassian Compass as a standalone option.” GPT-6 Luna · scale prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for new implementations — Atlassian is winding this down” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Ecosystem-centric portals like Atlassian Compass... can lack the deep extensibility or custom integration freedom” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best internal developer portal for a company with a limited budget is Atlassian Compass, which is a cheap per-user IDP at $8/user/mo” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Atlassian Compass is usually the best paid choice” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“If you're already using Atlassian tools, Compass is the most budget-friendly paid option.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.