Index › IT › Developer platform › Developer portals › Port vs Backstage
Internal developer portals · November 2026 Edition

Port vs Backstage

Ten of fourteen models named Port first on the direct prompt; zero named Backstage. Both were named by all fourteen models and Port carries 71 labels and Backstage 72, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Port

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

Backstage

criticized challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share57%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%42%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels7172A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Port reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Port vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud · Port vs Roadie · Port vs Atlassian Compass

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the internal developer portals page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PortFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBackstage
Direct1004 against Backstage
Paraphrase917 against Backstage
Comparative48
Budget-constrained755 against Backstage
Scale-constrained202 against Backstage
Negative004 against Port · 12 against Backstage
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Port and Backstage were named in the same answer 190 times, of the 215 answers naming Port and the 218 naming Backstage. In those answers Backstage took the first choice thirty-one times and Port ninety-five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Port and Backstage stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Port Backstage first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Port on the left and Backstage on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Port and Backstage stood in it.

Port first, Backstage an alternative

10 of 14 modelsBackstage was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashPort alternatives: Atlassian Compass, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Roadie
Perplexity SonarPort alternatives: Atlassian Compass, Backstage, Humanitec, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Mistral SmallPort
DeepSeek V4 FlashPort alternatives: OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Llama 4 MaverickPort alternatives: Backstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashPort alternatives: Humanitec
Kimi K2Port alternatives: OpsLevel
GLM 4.7 FlashXPort alternatives: Backstage, Humanitec, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
GPT-6 LunaPort alternatives: Backstage, OpsLevel
Muse Glimmer 30BPort alternatives: Backstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniRoadie alternatives: Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
Grok 4.20Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud alternatives: OpsLevel, Port, Roadie
MiniMax M2.5OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud alternatives: Backstage, Harness IDP, Roadie

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Port leads by fifty-seven points.
Port69%#1 of 7
Backstage11%#2 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Port leads by forty-five points.
Port57%#1 of 8
Backstage12%#2 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Port leads by twenty points.
Port44%#1 of 9
Backstage24%#2 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Port

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Proprietary Closed‑Source Portals (e.g., Port.io, OpsLevel, Atlassian Compass) | *Vendor lock‑in.*” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“you should carefully verify Port's compatibility with your infrastructure before committing fully” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“proprietary portals (Port.io, OpsLevel, Atlassian Compass, etc.) carry vendor lock-in risks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Port — Best Overall Value for Small-to-Mid Teams ... Port's free tier (up to 15 users) is the sweet spot between capability and cost.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Port is recommended for mid-sized B2B companies as it provides a good balance of time-to-value, governance, and mid-market pricing.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Port for balanced, quick-start portals with modern features like AI—often recommended as the "best for most teams"” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Backstage

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“it is arguably the biggest trap for companies without a dedicated "Platform Team" of at least 3–5 senior engineers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Backstage unless you have a dedicated platform engineering team and >1,000 developers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Self-Hosting Backstage unless you have 2+ dedicated platform engineers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“The Best Overall Choice (Zero Monetary Cost): Backstage ... the de facto industry standard for open-source developer portals” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Many teams start with Backstage for its flexibility but later discover they need more managed solutions” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually open-source Backstage — if you can afford some engineering time” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.