Feature flags · November 2026 Edition
Flagsmith vs ConfigCat
Five of fourteen models named Flagsmith first on the direct prompt; one named ConfigCat. Both were named by all fourteen models and Flagsmith carries 63 labels and ConfigCat 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share22%16%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels6339A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Flagsmith reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Unleash was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. LaunchDarkly vs Flagsmith · LaunchDarkly vs ConfigCat · Flagsmith vs GrowthBook
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the feature flags page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FlagsmithFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConfigCat
Direct51
Paraphrase31
Comparative10
Budget-constrained36
Scale-constrained00
Negative014 against Flagsmith · 1 against ConfigCat
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Flagsmith and ConfigCat were named in the same answer 116 times, of the 177 answers naming Flagsmith and the 138 naming ConfigCat. In those answers ConfigCat took the first choice thirty-five times and Flagsmith fifteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Flagsmith and ConfigCat stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | | |
Flagsmith ConfigCat first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Flagsmith on the left and ConfigCat on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Flagsmith and ConfigCat stood in it.
Flagsmith first, ConfigCat an alternative
5 of 14 modelsConfigCat was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Flagsmith alternatives: Reflag, Statsig
Mistral SmallFlagsmith, Unleash alternatives: ConfigCat, Split
Kimi K2Flagsmith, Statsig alternatives: GrowthBook
GLM 4.7 FlashXFlagsmith, GrowthBook alternatives: Split, Unleash
MiniMax M2.5Flagsmith, LaunchDarkly alternatives: GrowthBook, Split, Unleash
ConfigCat first, Flagsmith an alternative
1 of 14 modelsFlagsmith was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashConfigCat, GrowthBook alternatives: Flagsmith, Unleash
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniLaunchDarkly alternatives: Flagsmith, GrowthBook, Unleash
Gemini 3.5 FlashStatsig alternatives: Flagsmith, PostHog Feature Flags, Schematic, Unleash
Perplexity SonarLaunchDarkly alternatives: ConfigCat, GrowthBook, Harness FME, Statsig, Unleash
Grok 4.20LaunchDarkly alternatives: Flagsmith, GrowthBook, Harness FME, Statsig, Unleash
DeepSeek V4 FlashGrowthBook alternatives: Flagsmith, LaunchDarkly, Unleash
GPT-6 LunaStatsig alternatives: Flagsmith, LaunchDarkly
Muse Glimmer 30BReflag alternatives: Flagsmith, Statsig, WorkOS Feature Flags
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ConfigCat leads by fourteen points.
ConfigCat41%#1 of 8Flagsmith27%#2 of 8Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Flagsmith leads at mid-market.
Flagsmith22%#2 of 8ConfigCat16%#3 of 8Enterprise
The order flips: ConfigCat leads at enterprise.
ConfigCat14%#3 of 10Flagsmith4%#4 of 10What the models said about Flagsmith
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Flagsmith, for example, documents API-request limits on managed infrastructure and different pricing tiers” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Flagsmith provides bucketing but may require a separate analytics system to determine experiment winners” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Strong for self-hosting, but cloud versions can have scaling hiccups if not configured well” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd generally recommend Flagsmith if you want the best balance of capability, cost control, and deployment flexibility” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Flagsmith is an ideal fit for mid-sized SaaS teams that want developer control without enterprise-level pricing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Flagsmith and Unleash are the best choices due to their flexibility, cost, and robust feature sets” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about ConfigCat
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“ConfigCat, for example, is positioned for straightforward toggles and is not a full experimentation platform” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“My Recommendation: Start with ConfigCat. It requires no credit card, has no usage surprises, and is the easiest to adopt for a small team.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“ConfigCat (Best for pure feature flagging & simple pricing) ... Their paid plans are also among the cheapest in the industry” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“ConfigCat – best budget SaaS on-ramp... ConfigCat's forever free hosted plan is usually the lowest-friction start.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
LaunchDarkly vs FlagsmithLaunchDarkly vs ConfigCatFlagsmith vs GrowthBookFlagsmith vs UnleashFlagsmith vs StatsigFlagsmith vs PostHog Feature FlagsFlagsmith vs SplitConfigCat vs GrowthBookConfigCat vs UnleashConfigCat vs StatsigConfigCat vs PostHog Feature FlagsConfigCat vs SplitAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full feature flags standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.