ConfigCat vs Split
One of fourteen models named ConfigCat first on the direct prompt; zero named Split. ConfigCat was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Split by twelve and ConfigCat carries 39 labels and Split 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the feature flags page.
By framing
ConfigCatFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSplit
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ConfigCat and Split were named in the same answer forty-four times, of the 138 answers naming ConfigCat and the 80 naming Split. In those answers Split took the first choice zero times and ConfigCat eleven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
ConfigCat Split first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ConfigCat on the left and Split on the right.The direct prompt
ConfigCat first, Split not the choice
1 of 14 modelsSplit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ConfigCat41%#1 of 8Split0%#8 of 8ConfigCat14%#3 of 10Split0%#8 of 10What the models said about ConfigCat
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“ConfigCat, for example, is positioned for straightforward toggles and is not a full experimentation platform” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“My Recommendation: Start with ConfigCat. It requires no credit card, has no usage surprises, and is the easiest to adopt for a small team.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“ConfigCat (Best for pure feature flagging & simple pricing) ... Their paid plans are also among the cheapest in the industry” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“ConfigCat – best budget SaaS on-ramp... ConfigCat's forever free hosted plan is usually the lowest-friction start.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Split
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid paid-heavy tools like LaunchDarkly, Split.io, or DevCycle” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Be cautious about opaque, quote-based pricing, significant switching costs, and coupling of feature flagging to a broader Harness toolchain if you want portability.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“more expensive than alternatives for comparable functionality, lacks automatic analytics built into every flag check” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“High-End/Enterprise: LaunchDarkly, Split.io, Optimizely.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Split/Harness if experimentation is the core use case and you're comfortable with a more enterprise-oriented tool” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Statsig, GrowthBook, or Split/Harness when measuring product impact and running experiments is central.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.