One of fourteen models named Plivo first on the direct prompt; zero named Infobip. Plivo was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Infobip by thirteen and Plivo carries 54 labels and Infobip 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the communications apis page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Plivo and Infobip were named in the same answer forty-eight times, of the 142 answers naming Plivo and the 89 naming Infobip. In those answers Infobip took the first choice four times and Plivo three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Plivo and SMS.to are the platforms with the most consistently negative feedback in my research — exercise strong caution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Poor support quality: Trustpilot reviews (1.2/5 stars) mention AI support that can't help... Reliability issues” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Plivo (The "Price vs. Support" Trap)... Trustpilot reviews are exceptionally poor (frequently below 2 stars)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“If you're already sending thousands of messages monthly, switch to Plivo for significant savings.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“or Plivo for developer-friendly pricing + $10 free credits and no per-authentication fee” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“starting with Telnyx or Plivo for SMS/voice and SendGrid for email gives the best value” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Sinch or Infobip for small projects that only need basic transactional messaging; their broad international and omnichannel capabilities can add unnecessary complexity.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Great breadth (contact center, chat, email) but enterprise-focused” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Quote-only pricing — no transparent, self-serve pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Recognized as a leader in the 2024 Juniper Research Competitor Leaderboard for CPaaS” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Broad global portfolio covering messaging, email, voice, WhatsApp, RCS, video, and customer-data tools” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“Top ranked by Juniper 2024. Strong for broad customer engagement and omnichannel enterprise.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.