Artifact and container registries · November 2026 Edition
Harbor vs Google Artifact Registry
Zero of fourteen models named Harbor first on the direct prompt; zero named Google Artifact Registry. Both were named by all fourteen models and Harbor carries 42 labels and Google Artifact Registry 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Google Artifact Registry
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share5%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels4241A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Harbor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.JFrog Artifactory was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Sonatype Nexus Repository vs Harbor · Sonatype Nexus Repository vs Google Artifact Registry · JFrog Artifactory vs Harbor
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the artifact and container registries page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HarborFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGoogle Artifact RegistryDirect00
Paraphrase231 against Harbor · 1 against Google Artifact Registry
Comparative01
Budget-constrained10
Scale-constrained00
Negative111 against Harbor · 3 against Google Artifact Registry
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Harbor and Google Artifact Registry were named in the same answer seventy-nine times, of the 122 answers naming Harbor and the 122 naming Google Artifact Registry. In those answers Google Artifact Registry took the first choice five times and Harbor five.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Harbor and Google Artifact Registry stood in it.
| Model | DirectGA | ParaphraseGA | ComparativeGA | Budget-constrainedGA | Scale-constrainedGA | NegativeGA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | GA | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | GA | GA | GA | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | GA | GA | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | GA | | | GA | |
| Mistral Small | GA | GA | | GA | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | GA | | GA | GA | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | GA | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | GA | GA | GA | | GA | |
| Kimi K2 | GA | GA | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | GA | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | GA | | GA | GA | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | GA | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | GA | GA |
HarborGA Google Artifact Registry first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Harbor on the left and Google Artifact Registry on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Harbor and Google Artifact Registry stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.20JFrog Artifactory alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, GHCR, GitHub Packages, Harbor, ProGet, Sonatype Lifecycle
Mistral SmallJFrog Artifactory alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
DeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Llama 4 MaverickJFrog Artifactory alternatives: Amazon Elastic Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Qwen 3.7 FlashJFrog Artifactory alternatives: AWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, GitLab Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Lifecycle
GLM 4.7 FlashXSonatype Nexus Repository alternatives: Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
MiniMax M2.5Sonatype Nexus Repository alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Artifactory, Nexus Repository alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
GPT-5.4 miniSonatype Nexus Repository alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, JFrog Artifactory
Gemini 3.5 FlashGitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, ECR, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Perplexity SonarCloudsmith alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Kimi K2Sonatype Nexus Repository alternatives: Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages
GPT-6 LunaCloudsmith alternatives: AWS CodeArtifact, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Muse Glimmer 30BJFrog Artifactory alternatives: Cloudsmith, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Harbor0%#13 of 13Google Artifact Registry0%#10 of 13
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Harbor5%#5 of 15Google Artifact Registry5%#7 of 15
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
Google Artifact Registry leads by two points.
Google Artifact Registry3%#4 of 16
Harbor2%#6 of 16What the models said about Harbor
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“you should still: Ensure they are properly configured and not publicly exposed unless necessary.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cons: High operational overhead. You must patch, scale, and maintain the database and cache.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“or Harbor if you need a self-hosted, open-source solution with enterprise-grade security features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“or Harbor (if you want open-source flexibility and can manage your own infrastructure)” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition or Harbor are the best choices” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Google Artifact Registry
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“public registries like Docker Hub, GitHub Container Registry (GHCR), or Google Artifact Registry ... they pose high risks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“you should still: Ensure they are properly configured and not publicly exposed unless necessary.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not to be *avoided*, but cautious about relying on them as your only registry.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“if you need a single platform for all types of software artifacts, consider an artifact registry like Google Artifact Registry, Azure Artifacts, or JFrog Artifactory” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Google Artifact Registry or AWS ECR are common picks, but the cloud you already use should decide it.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Google Artifact Registry (if you're cloud-agnostic or on GCP/multi-cloud)” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Sonatype Nexus Repository vs HarborSonatype Nexus Repository vs Google Artifact RegistryJFrog Artifactory vs HarborJFrog Artifactory vs Google Artifact RegistryAmazon ECR vs HarborAmazon ECR vs Google Artifact RegistryGitHub Packages vs HarborGitHub Packages vs Google Artifact RegistryHarbor vs Azure Container RegistryHarbor vs CloudsmithAzure Container Registry vs Google Artifact RegistryGoogle Artifact Registry vs CloudsmithAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full artifact registries standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.