Two of fourteen models named Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard first on the direct prompt; zero named Approov. Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Approov by seven and Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard carries 54 labels and Approov 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the application shielding page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard and Approov were named in the same answer nineteen times, of the 155 answers naming Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard and the 28 naming Approov. In those answers Approov took the first choice three times and Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard five.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Do not go with Jscrambler or enterprise-tier tools (Appdome, Guardsquare, Zimperium)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid as a first choice on a tight budget: Appdome or Guardsquare” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“When evaluating commercial app shielding vendors (such as Guardsquare, Promon, Digital.ai, Appdome, PreEmptive, Zimperium, etc.), watch for these specific drawbacks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Guardsquare is the code-level benchmark, unifying continuous mobile app security testing (MAST) with polymorphic code hardening, and RASP.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Guardsquare is widely considered the gold standard for mobile app protection, combining advanced code obfuscation with automated RASP.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“DexGuard if you need the broadest mobile app protection, especially if you care about code hardening and anti-tamper protections.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“has limited full in-app shielding and requires additional tools for broader coverage” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“What to avoid on a tight budget” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Approov would be the leading recommendation if protecting backend APIs, preventing app impersonation, and minimizing integration effort are the priorities” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Approov if your app is API-centric and you need fast integration with backend enforcement.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Approov is a strong budget-conscious candidate because it offers runtime mobile app shielding / RASP” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.