Thirteen of fourteen models named Terraform first on the direct prompt; zero named Ansible. Both were named by all fourteen models and Terraform carries 87 labels and Ansible 50, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the infrastructure as code page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Terraform and Ansible were named in the same answer 118 times, of the 233 answers naming Terraform and the 145 naming Ansible. In those answers Ansible took the first choice three times and Terraform seventy-two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid for tight budgets: Paid platforms like Terraform Enterprise, Pulumi Team, or Spacelift” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Terraform under the BSL license (if your org has restrictions)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why be cautious: If you are building a commercial product... the BSL license may restrict your use or introduce legal compliance risks.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Preferred starters: Terraform (or OpenTofu, its open-source fork—use if concerned about HashiCorp's licensing shifts post-2023) for declarative multi-cloud.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“For most budget-constrained companies, Terraform offers the best balance of features, flexibility, and cost (free), making it the industry standard.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Terraform (or OpenTofu if licensing matters) remains the safest default due to ecosystem maturity, hiring pool, and governance tooling” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Why avoid for IaC: Weak state-tracking engines compared to purpose-built IaC tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Ansible, Chef, Salt, and Puppet for primary provisioning. These are primarily configuration-management tools, not infrastructure-provisioning engines.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“More focused on configuration than pure infrastructure provisioning; Terraform/OpenTofu are better for infrastructure lifecycle management.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“For a budget-constrained company, Ansible is the safest bet if you need a free, open-source solution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Ansible if your focus is more on app deployment/config than pure infrastructure ... less ideal for complex cloud resource graphs” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Ansible if your main need is configuration and automation of systems rather than provisioning cloud resources.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.