Three of fourteen models named OpenTofu first on the direct prompt; zero named Ansible. OpenTofu was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Ansible by fourteen and OpenTofu carries 57 labels and Ansible 50, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the infrastructure as code page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, OpenTofu and Ansible were named in the same answer eighty-five times, of the 166 answers naming OpenTofu and the 145 naming Ansible. In those answers Ansible took the first choice two times and OpenTofu thirty-eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“it is younger; validate support for niche providers, modules, CI/CD integrations, and state migrations before moving a large estate” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Don't assume a Terraform-to-OpenTofu switch is completely frictionless.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“the practical budget pick is: OpenTofu if you want Terraform compatibility with a permissive, truly open source license and zero software cost” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“many cost-conscious teams are now choosing OpenTofu, which is an open-source fork of Terraform designed to ensure it stays forever free” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For most budget-conscious companies, OpenTofu offers the best combination of zero licensing cost, mature features, multi-cloud support” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Why avoid for IaC: Weak state-tracking engines compared to purpose-built IaC tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Ansible, Chef, Salt, and Puppet for primary provisioning. These are primarily configuration-management tools, not infrastructure-provisioning engines.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“More focused on configuration than pure infrastructure provisioning; Terraform/OpenTofu are better for infrastructure lifecycle management.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“For a budget-constrained company, Ansible is the safest bet if you need a free, open-source solution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Ansible if your focus is more on app deployment/config than pure infrastructure ... less ideal for complex cloud resource graphs” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Ansible if your main need is configuration and automation of systems rather than provisioning cloud resources.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.