Index › HR › Compensation and total rewards › Compensation benchmarkin › Glassdoor vs Mercer Total Remuneration Survey
Compensation benchmarking data · November 2026 Edition
Glassdoor vs Mercer Total Remuneration Survey
Zero of fourteen models named Glassdoor first on the direct prompt; zero named Mercer Total Remuneration Survey. Glassdoor was named by ten of the fourteen models and Mercer Total Remuneration Survey by fourteen and Glassdoor carries 16 labels and Mercer Total Remuneration Survey 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate38%50%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels1634A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Glassdoor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Pave was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Payscale vs Glassdoor · Payscale vs Mercer Total Remuneration Survey · Pave vs Glassdoor
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compensation benchmarking data page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GlassdoorFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMercer Total Remuneration Survey
Direct001 against Glassdoor · 6 against Mercer Total Remuneration Survey
Paraphrase024 against Mercer Total Remuneration Survey
Comparative03
Budget-constrained202 against Mercer Total Remuneration Survey
Scale-constrained004 against Glassdoor · 2 against Mercer Total Remuneration Survey
Negative001 against Glassdoor · 3 against Mercer Total Remuneration Survey
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Glassdoor and Mercer Total Remuneration Survey were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 82 answers naming Glassdoor and the 92 naming Mercer Total Remuneration Survey. In those answers Mercer Total Remuneration Survey took the first choice two times and Glassdoor zero.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Glassdoor and Mercer Total Remuneration Survey stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Glassdoor Mercer Total Remuneration Survey first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Glassdoor on the left and Mercer Total Remuneration Survey on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Glassdoor and Mercer Total Remuneration Survey stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Mistral SmallPave alternatives: Mercer Total Remuneration Survey, Payscale
Llama 4 MaverickSalaryCube alternatives: Mercer Total Remuneration Survey, Pave, Payscale
Kimi K2Payscale alternatives: Mercer Total Remuneration Survey, Pave, Radford, Salary.com CompAnalyst
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Pave, SalaryCube alternatives: CompUp, OpenComp, Payscale Ascent
GPT-5.4 miniSalary.com CompAnalyst alternatives: Compensation-IQ, Pave, Payscale Ascent
Gemini 3.5 FlashPave alternatives: Carta Total Compensation, Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst
Perplexity SonarPayscale alternatives: Pave, Ravio, SalaryCube
Grok 4.20Payscale alternatives: Pave, Ravio, Salary.com CompAnalyst
DeepSeek V4 FlashPayscale alternatives: Mercer Benchmark Database, Pave, Ravio, SalaryCube
Qwen 3.7 FlashComprehensive.io alternatives: Figures, Pave, Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst
GLM 4.7 FlashXFigures, SalaryCube Comp Planning alternatives: Pave, Salary.com CompAnalyst
MiniMax M2.5CompAnalyst, Payscale alternatives: Pave
GPT-6 LunaPayscale alternatives: Pave
Muse Glimmer 30BPayscale alternatives: CompAnalyst, Comprehensive.io, Pave, Salary.com CompAnalyst, SalaryCube
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Glassdoor leads by three points.
Glassdoor3%#5 of 10Mercer Total Remuneration Survey0%#9 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Glassdoor4%#5 of 9Mercer Total Remuneration Survey4%#6 of 9Enterprise
The order flips: Mercer Total Remuneration Survey leads at enterprise.
Mercer Total Remuneration Survey33%#1 of 9Glassdoor0%#– of 9What the models said about Glassdoor
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Avoid those relying heavily on unverified crowdsourced data (e.g., from Glassdoor or Levels.fyi), as it can be biased or inflated.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · hard negative
“you're too large for free/consumer tools (Glassdoor, BLS) — those won't have the granularity or credibility you need” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“start with BLS + Glassdoor combined. This combination provides accurate, defensible data for most common positions at zero cost.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“start with free tools (BLS OEWS + Glassdoor) to get a solid baseline” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Best For: Quick market checks, especially for office jobs and white-collar roles.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
What the models said about Mercer Total Remuneration Survey
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Providers to avoid or use carefully include: - Mercer, Willis Towers Watson (WTW), and Radford when the budget is tight” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid traditional enterprise survey providers (like Radford/Aon, Mercer, or Willis Towers Watson” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Mid-Market: Radford (Aon), Mercer, or Willis Towers Watson” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“One of the most comprehensive and widely used surveys globally... Best for: Mid-sized companies seeking robust, benchmarked data” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Mercer, WTW, Aon/Radford, or Korn Ferry for global compensation structures and job architecture.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need to set salary bands globally, choose Mercer for breadth.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Payscale vs GlassdoorPayscale vs Mercer Total Remuneration SurveyPave vs GlassdoorPave vs Mercer Total Remuneration SurveyComprehensive.io vs GlassdoorComprehensive.io vs Mercer Total Remuneration SurveySalary.com CompAnalyst vs GlassdoorSalary.com CompAnalyst vs Mercer Total Remuneration SurveyGlassdoor vs RadfordGlassdoor vs Willis Towers WatsonMercer Total Remuneration Survey vs RadfordMercer Total Remuneration Survey vs Willis Towers WatsonAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full compensation benchmarkin standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.