Lattice vs AssessTEAM
Twelve of fourteen models named Lattice first on the direct prompt; zero named AssessTEAM. Lattice was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and AssessTEAM by twelve and Lattice carries 59 labels and AssessTEAM 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in fifteen categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the performance management page.
By framing
LatticeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAssessTEAM
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Lattice AssessTEAM first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lattice on the left and AssessTEAM on the right.The direct prompt
Lattice first, AssessTEAM not the choice
12 of 14 modelsAssessTEAM was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Lattice25%#1 of 13AssessTEAM18%#2 of 13Lattice47%#1 of 13AssessTEAM16%#3 of 13Lattice13%#3 of 10AssessTEAM—not namedWhat the models said about Lattice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Avoid overkill tools like Lattice (excellent but often $8+/user)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Choose Lattice if your B2B company wants a comprehensive "system of record" for performance tied to talent reviews, compensation, and people analytics.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about AssessTEAM
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“criticized for being glitchy and having a steep learning curve” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“AssessTEAM – the lowest-cost all-rounder ... "Best overall performance management software for small companies"” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“highlighted as the best overall for small companies, with competitive pricing and a wide range of features” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“AssessTEAM at $2/user/month with no minimum users and a free trial is the most cost‑effective choice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.