Index › HR › Core HR and payroll › Time and attendance › Deputy vs Connecteam
Time and attendance · November 2026 Edition

Deputy vs Connecteam

Four of fourteen models named Deputy first on the direct prompt; zero named Connecteam. Both were named by all fourteen models and Deputy carries 35 labels and Connecteam 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Deputy

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Connecteam

accepted challenger

Named in eighteen categories this edition.

First-choice share10%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels3540A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Deputy reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Rippling was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Rippling vs Deputy · Rippling vs Connecteam · Clockify vs Deputy

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the time and attendance page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DeputyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConnecteam
Direct40
Paraphrase10
Comparative40
Budget-constrained011 against Deputy
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Deputy and Connecteam were named in the same answer 240 times, of the 401 answers naming Deputy and the 718 naming Connecteam. In those answers Connecteam took the first choice forty-seven times and Deputy forty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Deputy and Connecteam stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Deputy Connecteam first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Deputy on the left and Connecteam on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Deputy and Connecteam stood in it.

Deputy first, Connecteam an alternative

4 of 14 modelsConnecteam was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashDeputy alternatives: OnTheClock, QuickBooks Time, Synerion
GLM 4.7 FlashXDeputy, Rippling alternatives: Connecteam, QuickBooks Time, Synerion, TimeCamp
MiniMax M2.5Deputy, Rippling alternatives: Connecteam, Paylocity, UKG Ready
Muse Glimmer 30BDeputy, Synerion alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, TimeClock Plus, UKG Pro Workforce Management

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Paycom alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, Paylocity, Rippling
GPT-5.4 miniUKG Ready alternatives: Connecteam, Gusto, QuickBooks Time, Rippling
Perplexity SonarRippling alternatives: BambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam, Deputy, Paycor, Synerion, UKG Ready
DeepSeek V4 FlashTCP Humanity alternatives: Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy, Rippling, UKG Ready

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashRippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, ClickTime, Paylocity, Replicon, UKG Ready
Grok 4.20Rippling alternatives: Paycom, UKG Ready
Mistral SmallSynerion alternatives: Factorial, Microsoft Teams, isolved Time
Llama 4 MaverickSynerion alternatives: Factorial, Microsoft Teams, isolved Time
Kimi K2Rippling alternatives: Paylocity, Synerion, UKG Ready
GPT-6 LunaRippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, UKG Ready

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Deputy leads by two points.
Deputy4%#8 of 17
Connecteam2%#12 of 17
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Deputy leads by eight points.
Deputy10%#5 of 17
Connecteam2%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Deputy leads by five points.
Deputy6%#4 of 13
Connecteam2%#10 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Deputy

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Deputy offers the strongest overall combination of time tracking, attendance management, scheduling, and workforce controls” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Start with a trial of Deputy. It offers the broadest feature set for a mid-sized team” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Connecteam

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.