Eight of fourteen models named SalesScreen first on the direct prompt; zero named Plecto. SalesScreen was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Plecto by thirteen and SalesScreen carries 64 labels and Plecto 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales gamification page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, SalesScreen and Plecto were named in the same answer seventy-seven times, of the 187 answers naming SalesScreen and the 85 naming Plecto. In those answers Plecto took the first choice one time and SalesScreen fifteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Verdict: Avoid if you need reliable, seamless integrations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like SalesScreen, Ambition, or SmartWinnr” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“data management issues with conflicting information and reliance on extraction... steep learning curve, need for better onboarding and guidance” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“SalesScreen: Often cited as the most comprehensive option for larger teams. It offers deep analytics and a very polished "dashboard" look.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice
“Platforms like SalesScreen excel here... Highest G2 ratings for pure play; excellent multi-round contests; great TV dashboards.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Consistently rates highly with managers *and* reps; praised for real-time updates and combined coaching + competition.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Plecto ($24/user/month, 10-license minimum = $240+/month) – Too expensive for small teams” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“pure dashboard tools might lack the immersive features reps expect from true gamification engines” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Plecto has a 10-license minimum; verify whether that aligns with your team size.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“Plecto ($24/user/month, 10-license minimum) — Good balance of dashboards and contests” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Plecto if you want real-time KPI dashboards across sales, contact center, and service teams in addition to gamification.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
“Plecto and Hoopla excel for teams that want a solid set of dashboards/leaderboards at a reasonable price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.