Index › GTM › Marketing › Webinars › Livestorm vs Zoho Webinar
Webinar and virtual event platforms · November 2026 Edition

Livestorm vs Zoho Webinar

Seven of fourteen models named Livestorm first on the direct prompt; zero named Zoho Webinar. Livestorm was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Zoho Webinar by nine and Livestorm carries 54 labels and Zoho Webinar 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Livestorm

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

Zoho Webinar

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share34%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels5411A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Livestorm reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Goldcast was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Livestorm vs Demio · Livestorm vs Goldcast · Livestorm vs Zoom Webinars

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the webinar and virtual event platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LivestormFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZoho Webinar
Direct70
Paraphrase80
Comparative00
Budget-constrained56
Scale-constrained00
Negative101 against Livestorm
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Livestorm and Zoho Webinar stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Livestorm Zoho Webinar first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Livestorm on the left and Zoho Webinar on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Livestorm and Zoho Webinar stood in it.

Livestorm first, Zoho Webinar not the choice

7 of 14 modelsZoho Webinar was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Livestorm alternatives: Demio, Goldcast
GPT-5.4 miniLivestorm, RingCentral Events alternatives: ON24, Zoom Webinars
Perplexity SonarLivestorm alternatives: BigMarker, Bizzabo, Goldcast, ON24, Zoom Webinars
Grok 4.20Livestorm alternatives: Hubilo
Mistral SmallAirmeet, Livestorm alternatives: Goldcast, ON24, Zoom Webinars
DeepSeek V4 FlashLivestorm alternatives: Airmeet, Demio, Goldcast
Kimi K2Livestorm alternatives: BigMarker, Demio, Goldcast

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoldcast alternatives: Airmeet, Livestorm, Zoom Webinars
GLM 4.7 FlashXDemio, Goldcast alternatives: GoTo Webinar, Livestorm
GPT-6 LunaGoldcast alternatives: Livestorm, ON24, Zoom Webinars
Muse Glimmer 30BZoom Webinars alternatives: Airmeet, Goldcast, Livestorm, ON24

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashDemio alternatives: GoTo Webinar, Goldcast, RingCentral Events, Zoom Webinars
MiniMax M2.5Demio alternatives: Airmeet, EasyWebinar, GoTo Webinar, Zoom Webinars

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Livestorm leads by thirty points.
Livestorm40%#2 of 14
Zoho Webinar9%#3 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Livestorm leads by twenty-four points.
Livestorm34%#1 of 16
Zoho Webinar10%#3 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Zoho Webinar is not named for this buyer.
Livestorm0%#14 of 15
Zoho Webinar—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Livestorm

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Older reviews explicitly advise against subscribing.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“If I had to pick one for most mid-sized B2B companies, I'd recommend [Livestorm](https://livestorm.co) as your primary platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Livestorm and Demio are the top recommendations due to their strong B2B features, ease of use, and scalability” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Livestorm stands out as the best overall webinar and virtual event platform for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Zoho Webinar

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Best ultra-budget choice: Zoho Webinar — G2 reports a free tier ... making it one of the cheapest options for small teams.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Livestorm and Zoho Webinar are top picks due to their free plans and affordable pricing” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value for Dedicated Webinars: Zoho Webinar / Zoho Meeting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.