Index › GTM › Marketing › SEO › Clearscope vs SE Ranking
SEO and content optimization platforms · November 2026 Edition

Clearscope vs SE Ranking

Gane, the publisher, sells software in this category. Every product here is measured by the same method as in every other category. How the conflict is handled.

One of fourteen models named Clearscope first on the direct prompt; zero named SE Ranking. Clearscope was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and SE Ranking by eleven and Clearscope carries 60 labels and SE Ranking 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Clearscope

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

SE Ranking

accepted challenger

United States, founded 2012. Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share12%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels6023A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Clearscope reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Semrush was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Surfer SEO vs Clearscope · Surfer SEO vs SE Ranking · Semrush vs Clearscope

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SEO and content optimization platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ClearscopeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSE Ranking
Direct10
Paraphrase40
Comparative00
Budget-constrained043 against Clearscope · 1 against SE Ranking
Scale-constrained10
Negative018 against Clearscope
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Clearscope and SE Ranking were named in the same answer forty-nine times, of the 165 answers naming Clearscope and the 100 naming SE Ranking. In those answers SE Ranking took the first choice twelve times and Clearscope six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Clearscope and SE Ranking stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Clearscope SE Ranking first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Clearscope on the left and SE Ranking on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Clearscope and SE Ranking stood in it.

Clearscope first, SE Ranking not the choice

1 of 14 modelsSE Ranking was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashClearscope alternatives: Ahrefs, Conductor, Frase, MarketMuse, Semrush, Surfer SEO

Neither was the first choice, one was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Surfer SEO alternatives: Clearscope, MarketMuse, SE Ranking, Semrush
Perplexity SonarSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Google Analytics 4, Google Search Console, HubSpot Marketing Hub, SE Ranking, Search Atlas
Grok 4.20Semrush, Surfer SEO alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Frase, LowFruits, MarketMuse, RankUp, Search Atlas
DeepSeek V4 FlashSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Similarweb, Surfer SEO
Qwen 3.7 FlashSemrush alternatives: Clearscope, HubSpot Content Hub, Surfer SEO, xSeek
Kimi K2Surfer SEO alternatives: Clearscope, MarketMuse, Semrush
GLM 4.7 FlashXSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Surfer SEO
MiniMax M2.5Ahrefs, Semrush alternatives: Clearscope, Frase, Surfer SEO
GPT-6 LunaSemrush AI Visibility Toolkit alternatives: Clearscope, Conductor
Muse Glimmer 30BSurfer SEO alternatives: Clearscope, MarketMuse, Semrush

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniConductor alternatives: BrightEdge
Mistral SmallSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Surfer SEO
Llama 4 MaverickSemrush

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
SE Ranking leads by eleven points.
SE Ranking14%#3 of 14
Clearscope4%#9 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Clearscope leads at mid-market.
Clearscope12%#3 of 14
SE Ranking8%#5 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Clearscope leads by six points.
Clearscope6%#5 of 11
SE Ranking0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Clearscope

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid premium-heavy tools like Clearscope, SurferSEO, or Frase unless you can allocate $100+/month” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid paying for Clearscope, MarketMuse, or Semrush initially” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“for example, Surfer, Clearscope, or Frase. They can help with research and coverage, but don’t treat a score, suggested word count, or list of terms as a ranking formula.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“the most recommended SEO content optimization tools are Semrush and Clearscope” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Prioritize SurferSEO or Clearscope for their scoring/briefing depth.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“My default pick would be Clearscope for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about SE Ranking

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“its current Core plan is $103.20/month billed annually, so it may not fit a tight budget” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Safer starting points: Consider SE Ranking (budget-friendly all-in-one with good content features)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“If you must choose only one platform to start, go with SE Ranking.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.