Thirteen of fourteen models named Unbounce first on the direct prompt; zero named Landingi. Unbounce was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Landingi by nine and Unbounce carries 64 labels and Landingi 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Vancouver, Canada, founded 2009. Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the landing pages and interactive content page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Unbounce and Landingi were named in the same answer sixty-six times, of the 201 answers naming Unbounce and the 86 naming Landingi. In those answers Landingi took the first choice two times and Unbounce fourteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Unbounce has drawn criticism for aggressive price increases—reportedly ranging from 120% to 415% for some existing customers.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Ones to Approach with Caution or Avoid - Unbounce: ... Trustpilot scores are low (~1.9/5). Better alternatives exist” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Unbounce, Wix, and Squarespace if you need high-converting, conversion-optimized landing pages.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Core landing pages: Unbounce. Good for teams that need fast launch, A/B testing, AI traffic routing and personalization without adding headcount.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most users, I'd strongly recommend skipping all three and going with Unbounce, Webflow, or a self-hosted WordPress solution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Unbounce if you are running paid ads (Facebook/Google) and need advanced analytics, customization, and stability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“avoid for only a few occasional pages; its strengths are high-volume publishing and agency workflows, which can add unnecessary cost and complexity” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Landingi's page builder can have rather slow load times” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Landingi Lite ~$29/mo is the most cited best-value paid builder” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Landingi offers an AI composer, SEO generator, and A/B testing for agencies and high‑volume campaigns at a lower price point.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
“Best if you need multiple campaigns, forms, integrations, reusable sections, and more advanced marketing features.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.