Thirteen of fourteen models named Unbounce first on the direct prompt; three named HubSpot Landing Pages. Unbounce was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and HubSpot Landing Pages by thirteen and Unbounce carries 64 labels and HubSpot Landing Pages 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Vancouver, Canada, founded 2009. Named in three categories this edition.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the landing pages and interactive content page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Unbounce and HubSpot Landing Pages were named in the same answer sixty-seven times, of the 201 answers naming Unbounce and the 78 naming HubSpot Landing Pages. In those answers HubSpot Landing Pages took the first choice ten times and Unbounce twenty-four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Unbounce has drawn criticism for aggressive price increases—reportedly ranging from 120% to 415% for some existing customers.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Ones to Approach with Caution or Avoid - Unbounce: ... Trustpilot scores are low (~1.9/5). Better alternatives exist” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Unbounce, Wix, and Squarespace if you need high-converting, conversion-optimized landing pages.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Core landing pages: Unbounce. Good for teams that need fast launch, A/B testing, AI traffic routing and personalization without adding headcount.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most users, I'd strongly recommend skipping all three and going with Unbounce, Webflow, or a self-hosted WordPress solution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Unbounce if you are running paid ads (Facebook/Google) and need advanced analytics, customization, and stability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“avoid as a standalone choice if you are not already committed to the HubSpot ecosystem” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“free tier pages carry vendor branding and no custom domain... steep learning curve” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“I recommend HubSpot's Landing Pages combined with its interactive content features ... as the top overall choice.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with Unbounce or HubSpot Landing Pages, depending on your existing tech stack.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For B2B teams running high volumes of campaign-specific landing pages, this is a serious advantage” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.