Index › GTM › Marketing › Click fraud protection › Lunio vs Fraud Blocker
Click fraud protection · November 2026 Edition

Lunio vs Fraud Blocker

Two of fourteen models named Lunio first on the direct prompt; zero named Fraud Blocker. Lunio was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Fraud Blocker by thirteen and Lunio carries 36 labels and Fraud Blocker 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Lunio

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Fraud Blocker

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share13%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3630A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lunio reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ClickCease was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ClickCease vs Lunio · ClickCease vs Fraud Blocker · Lunio vs ClickGUARD

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the click fraud protection page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LunioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFraud Blocker
Direct201 against Lunio
Paraphrase401 against Lunio
Comparative00
Budget-constrained031 against Lunio
Scale-constrained10
Negative002 against Lunio · 3 against Fraud Blocker
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Lunio and Fraud Blocker were named in the same answer thirty-eight times, of the 111 answers naming Lunio and the 74 naming Fraud Blocker. In those answers Fraud Blocker took the first choice one time and Lunio seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lunio and Fraud Blocker stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Lunio Fraud Blocker first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lunio on the left and Fraud Blocker on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lunio and Fraud Blocker stood in it.

Lunio first, Fraud Blocker not the choice

2 of 14 modelsFraud Blocker was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniLunio alternatives: Cheq, ClickCease
Gemini 3.5 FlashLunio alternatives: Cheq, ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuard

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarCheq alternatives: ClickCease, Lunio
DeepSeek V4 FlashClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, Lunio
GPT-6 LunaCHEQ Acquisition alternatives: Lunio
Muse Glimmer 30BClickCease alternatives: Fraud Blocker, IPQualityScore, Lunio, TrafficGuard

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol alternatives: ClickCease, Spider AF
Grok 4.20ClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, TrafficGuard
Mistral SmallClickCease alternatives: Cheq, Spider AF
Llama 4 MaverickClickCease
Qwen 3.7 FlashClickCease alternatives: TrafficGuard
Kimi K2ClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, PPC Protect
GLM 4.7 FlashXClickGUARD alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGuardian, TrafficGuard
MiniMax M2.5ClickCease, ClickGUARD alternatives: Cheq, TrafficGuard

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Lunio leads by four points.
Lunio6%#4 of 10
Fraud Blocker2%#9 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Lunio leads by eight points.
Lunio13%#2 of 10
Fraud Blocker6%#5 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Lunio leads by nineteen points.
Lunio25%#1 of 13
Fraud Blocker5%#6 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Lunio

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Complaints center on admin overhead (manual tweaks needed), questionable effectiveness, and not being "worth the hassle"” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools such as Lunio unless your annual paid-media spend is very high” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“The same limitation applies to the broader category that ClickCease, ClickGuard, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuard and Lunio belong to” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lunio is a real-time invalid traffic detection tool that uses AI and machine learning to detect and prevent invalid traffic. It is recommended for mid-market B2B companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“consider: Lunio, CHEQ, DataDome, and Anura – these are noted as enterprise-ready with proper security credentials and multi-account capabilities.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd lean toward Lunio since it offers broader platform coverage and cross-channel insights” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fraud Blocker

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“While budget-friendly, it has received mixed reviews, with a rating of only 2.5/5, suggesting it may not be as reliable as other options.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fraud Blocker and Clixtell rely mainly on IP exclusions and click-frequency rules, which may be limiting for complex fraud patterns.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cons include complex implementation, outdated docs, limited integrations, and potential for blocking good traffic.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fraud Blocker is best for budget-conscious buyers, offering clear entry pricing starting from $79/month with a 7-day free trial.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Pure Affordability ... Often starts under $50–$70/month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“A. Fraud Blocker — *Best overall value for small businesses*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.