Index › GTM › Customer › AI voice agents › Vapi vs PolyAI
AI voice agents · November 2026 Edition

Vapi vs PolyAI

Zero of fourteen models named Vapi first on the direct prompt; zero named PolyAI. Vapi was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and PolyAI by twelve and Vapi carries 52 labels and PolyAI 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Vapi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

PolyAI

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share8%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels5224A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Vapi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Retell AI was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. CloudTalk vs Vapi · CloudTalk vs PolyAI · Retell AI vs Vapi

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI voice agents page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
VapiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPolyAI
Direct002 against PolyAI
Paraphrase101 against PolyAI
Comparative30
Budget-constrained30
Scale-constrained01
Negative006 against Vapi · 2 against PolyAI
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Vapi and PolyAI were named in the same answer forty times, of the 135 answers naming Vapi and the 59 naming PolyAI. In those answers PolyAI took the first choice six times and Vapi two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Vapi and PolyAI stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Vapi PolyAI first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Vapi on the left and PolyAI on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Vapi and PolyAI stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Aloware, CloudTalk alternatives: ElevenLabs Agents, Retell AI, Synthflow, Vapi
GPT-5.4 miniTalkdesk alternatives: ElevenLabs, Genesys Cloud CX, OpenAI Presence, Vapi
Gemini 3.5 FlashRetell AI alternatives: Regal.io, Sierra, Synthflow AI, Vapi
Grok 4.20CloudTalk alternatives: Retell AI, Vapi
DeepSeek V4 FlashCloudTalk alternatives: ElevenLabs Conversational AI, JustCall, Retell AI, Synthflow, Vapi
Qwen 3.7 FlashCloudTalk alternatives: Cresta, Microsoft Copilot Studio, Retell AI, Synthflow AI, Vapi
GLM 4.7 FlashXRetell AI alternatives: Aircall, CloudTalk, Synthflow, Vapi
GPT-6 LunaRetell AI alternatives: PolyAI, Synthflow, Vapi
Muse Glimmer 30BCloudTalk alternatives: Nextiva XBert, Retell AI, Vapi

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarCloudTalk alternatives: Retell AI
Mistral SmallKore.ai, Synthflow alternatives: Girikon AI
Llama 4 MaverickCloudTalk
Kimi K2Retell AI alternatives: CloudTalk, Synthflow
MiniMax M2.5CloudTalk, Five9 alternatives: Retell AI, Synthflow

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Vapi leads by four points.
Vapi4%#6 of 11
PolyAI0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Vapi leads by six points.
Vapi8%#3 of 8
PolyAI2%#5 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: PolyAI leads at enterprise.
PolyAI13%#2 of 12
Vapi4%#8 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Vapi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Multiple AI model reviews flag Vapi with a high negative share (43% negative labels in one analysis).” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Vapi - 43% of labels are negative, and 8 out of 14 models have negative sentiments.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Vapi, if you want a turnkey, low-maintenance setup or maximum control over the whole stack. Its docs say recordings, logging, and transcription are enabled by default” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Vapi or Retell AI if you are a developer or team building a scalable, customized phone agent” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Vapi offers the most flexibility—you can swap speech-to-text, LLM, and TTS providers” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Often cited as having the most flexible infrastructure... Choose Retell AI or Vapi” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about PolyAI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid enterprise-heavy options like PolyAI or Cognigy unless your needs are highly regulated” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Mid-Sized B2B: PolyAI — Excellent but built for enterprise contact centers” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-heavy solutions like PolyAI (~$150K/year)” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · hard negative
“PolyAI — strong for enterprise call centers with complex routing and handoff” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“PolyAI if you're closer to enterprise scale and need broader contact-center or omnichannel capabilities” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · alternative
“PolyAI is stronger if you want a more managed enterprise-grade inbound voice automation experience” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.