Workiva ESG
Strongest at enterprise, contested with Watershed. Ranked 16 of 134 for mid-market buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Greenly is first at 33%.
Greenly is first at 24%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first, contested: Watershed has 31%.
Why models recommend it
“If your priority is board-ready, auditable ESG reporting with strong controls, Workiva and IBM Envizi tend to stand out.”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · first choice
“Choose Workiva when the priority is controlled, auditable ESG disclosure tied to finance, legal, and investor reporting.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
“Leading platform for governed, audit-ready ESG disclosures, especially for large organizations with complex reporting needs.”Mistral Small · Comparative question · first choice
“Best for: Large enterprises with complex, audit-ready reporting needs... Unified financial + non-financial data”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“What to Avoid (When on a Tight Budget) - Workiva, Sphera, IBM Envizi – Enterprise-grade platforms with heavy implementation costs”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“it is recommended to avoid Workiva if you are a smaller ESG team, have a tight budget, or prioritize carbon-first reporting”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Avoid jumping to larger enterprise tools like Workiva unless you already know you need advanced controls”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid Workiva, IBM Envizi, and similar enterprise platforms”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Workiva ESG, over the 140 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 1 | View → | |
| 57 | 19 | Compare → | |
| 52 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 50 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 49 | 11 | Compare → | |
| 46 | 0 | View → | |
| 43 | 0 | View → | |
| 38 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 37 | 0 | View → | |
| 25 | 3 | View → |
What the models named instead of Workiva ESG →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 130 of the 140 answers that named Workiva ESG and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
331 of the 331 domain citations in answers naming Workiva ESG came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 338 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 66 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workiva.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.