Chargeback Gurus is a chargeback management product from Chargeback that combines software with expert support for handling evidence and representment · chargeback.io ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Chargeblast is first at 23%.
Chargeblast is first at 19%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Chargebacks911 is first at 25%.
“the best chargeback management tool is usually Chargeback Gurus”GPT-5.4 mini · Direct question · first choice
“Choose Chargebacks911 or Chargeback Gurus if difficult cases require human analysts.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“Better for analysis, early detection, and proactive resolution—fewer automation risks.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · alternative
“Best For: Enterprise businesses looking for data analytics and root-cause mitigation.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Great product, but setup fees (~$500) and per-chargeback pricing can be opaque for mid-market budgets.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Chargeback Gurus, over the 33 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 5 | View → | |
| 21 | 3 | View → | |
| 20 | 6 | View → | |
| 19 | 6 | View → | |
| 19 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 4 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 2 | View → | |
| 11 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Chargeback Gurus →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Chargeback Gurus's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 33 of the 33 answers that named Chargeback Gurus and are not a share of its labels.
106 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Chargeback Gurus came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 159 | 100 | 2026-09-30 | Chargeback management, Payment orchestration | |
| Glossary or explainer | 38 | 38 | 2026-09-28 | Chargeback management | |
| Comparison | 31 | 23 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Every page chargeback.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.