Index › Finance › Treasury and cash › Treasury management syst › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition
Treasury management systems for enterprise buyers
Asked as “treasury management system”, and as “TMS”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47Kyriba12Oracle Transportation Management08GTreasury33others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Trovata vs CentimeTrovata vs TreasuryViewTrovata vs HighRadius Treasury ManagementAgicap vs KyribaAgicap vs GTreasuryAgicap vs CentimeAgicap vs TreasuryViewAgicap vs HighRadius Treasury ManagementKyriba vs GTreasuryKyriba vs CentimeKyriba vs TreasuryViewKyriba vs HighRadius Treasury ManagementGTreasury vs CentimeGTreasury vs TreasuryViewGTreasury vs HighRadius Treasury ManagementCentime vs TreasuryViewCentime vs HighRadius Treasury ManagementTreasuryView vs HighRadius Treasury Management
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Kyriba47%
Kyriba47%02GTreasury8%
GTreasury8%03HighRadius Treasury Management6%
HighRadius Treasury Management6%04ION Treasury2%
ION Treasury2%05SAP Treasury and Risk Management0%
SAP Treasury and Risk Management0%06FIS Quantum0%
FIS Quantum0%07FIS0%
FIS0%08Coupa Treasury0%
Coupa Treasury0%09Oracle Treasury0%
Oracle Treasury0%10Trovata0%
Trovata0%What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Treasury and Risk Management18%
6 of 33 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“SAP Treasury and Risk Management can be strong for SAP-centric groups, but if you are not deeply standardized on SAP, you may face more integration and process constraints” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Trovata33%
7 of 21 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Trovata: Some reviewers report "bank connectivity issues not experienced with other TMS tools"” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Agicap100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Platforms like Agicap, Trovata, and TreasuryView are excellent for smaller businesses. However, a large, complex enterprise should avoid them” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
ION Treasury17%
4 of 23 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“ION Treasury is the absolute giant in this space... Treasury circles frequently cite ION for aggressive contracting, high maintenance/license escalators” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
65 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 992 links across 268 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
45 answers · 64 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Ripple38 answers · 48 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Eco29 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · DebtBook26 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics19 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Nomentia17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Guideflow15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Concourse14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 12 models
35 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best treasury management system”, “treasury management system”, “treasury management systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyriba kyriba.com | 47% | 248 | 4,400 | 155 | 38,514 | 45 | 2 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle Transportation Management 12%, Oracle Treasury 0% | 12% | 21 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| GTreasury gtreasury.com | 8% | 101 | 1,900 | 41 | 82 | 0 | ||
| HighRadius Treasury Management highradius.com | 6% | 25 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | 2 | ||
| Smartling smartling.com | 6% | 1 | ||||||
| Workday workday.com | 4% | 38 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 | 80 | ||
| ION iongroup.com ION Treasury 2% | 2% | 61 | 70 | 0 | 11,394 company | 0 | ||
| Phrase TMS phrase.com | 2% | |||||||
| Reval | 2% | |||||||
| BlackLine blackline.com | 2% | 249 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 | $4,066 | 79 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (debtbook.com, gartner.com, nomentia.com, treasury.ripple.com). The first result for “best treasury management system” is linkedin.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best treasury management system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which TMS would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade treasury management systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best treasury management system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a treasury management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which treasury management systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldGTreasury, KyribaKyribano first choicenothing named
One alternative
SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Ripple Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementGPT-5.4 miniKyribaSmartlingChangedKyribaKyribaagainst: Coupa Treasury, GTreasuryno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
GTreasury / Ripple Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Phrase TMS, memoQ TMSThree alternatives
Coupa Treasury, FIS Treasury and Risk Manager, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
FIS, Oracle TreasuryGemini 3.5 FlashKyribaKyribaHeldKyribaCegid AllmybanksKyribaagainst: ERP-Native Modulesagainst: Agicap, ION Treasury, Microsoft Dynamics, Oracle Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, TreasuryView, Trovata, Workday
Five alternatives
FIS, HighRadius Treasury Management, ION Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, TrovataTwo alternatives
FIS Integrity, TrovataFour alternatives
FIS, ION Treasury, Ripple Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Kyriba, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, TrovataThree alternatives
Coupa Treasury, ION Treasury, TrovataPerplexity SonarKyribaOracle Transportation ManagementChangedKyribaKyribano first choiceagainst: SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Three alternatives
GTreasury, HighRadius Treasury Management, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Blue Yonder, E2open, SAP TMSeven alternatives
Coupa Treasury, FIS Treasury, GTreasury, ION Treasury, Oracle Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, TISThree alternatives
GTreasury, ION Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementGrok 4.20GTreasury, KyribaOracle Transportation ManagementChangedKyribaGTreasury, Kyribaagainst: TrovataKyribaagainst: FIS Quantum, ION Treasury, Nomentia, Oracle Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, Salmon, TreasuryXpress
Three alternatives
FIS, HighRadius Treasury Management, ION TreasuryThree alternatives
Blue Yonder, Manhattan Associates, SAP TMThree alternatives
FIS Quantum, GTreasury, ION TreasuryThree alternatives
FIS Quantum, Oracle Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementFour alternatives
GTreasury, HighRadius Treasury Management, Palm, TrovataMistral SmallKyribaWorkdayChangedKyribaKyribaKyriba, Revalagainst: Coupa Treasury, TIS
Two alternatives
GTreasury, HighRadius Treasury ManagementFour alternatives
Ceridian Dayforce HCM, Cornerstone OnDemand, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactorsFive alternatives
FIS Treasury, GTreasury, ION Treasury, Nomentia, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Cobase, ION TreasuryOne alternative
HighRadius Treasury ManagementDeepSeek V4 FlashKyribaOracle Transportation ManagementChangedKyribaGTreasury, Kyribaagainst: Trovatano first choiceagainst: Agicap, Atlar, FIS Treasury, ION Treasury, Modern Treasury, Oracle Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, Trovata
Six alternatives
FIS Quantum, GTreasury, ION Treasury, Oracle Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, TISThree alternatives
Blue Yonder TMS, Manhattan Active TMS, SAP Transportation ManagementFive alternatives
GTreasury, ION Treasury, Oracle Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, TISThree alternatives
FIS Quantum, Finmo, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementLlama 4 MaverickHighRadius Treasury ManagementOracle Transportation ManagementChangedno first choiceKyribano first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Kyriba, Ripple Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementThree alternatives
CargoWise, GoFreight, SAP TMQwen 3.7 FlashION Treasury, KyribaOracle Transportation Management, SmartlingChangedKyribaagainst: SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementBlackLineagainst: FISno first choiceagainst: Oracle Treasury, SAP S/4HANA
Three alternatives
GTreasury, HighRadius Treasury Management, TISTwo alternatives
Phrase, SAP Transportation ManagementFour alternatives
FIS, GTreasury, ION Treasury, Ripple TreasuryTwo alternatives
Gensuite, KyribaKimi K2HighRadius Treasury Management, KyribaBlue Yonder Transportation Management, Oracle Transportation ManagementChangedKyribaGTreasury, Kyribaagainst: Modern Treasury, TrovataKyribaagainst: Agicap, ION Treasury, Kyriba, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, Trovata
Three alternatives
FIS Quantum, GTreasury, TrovataFour alternatives
Descartes TMS, Manhattan Active Transportation Management, MercuryGate, SAP Transportation ManagementFour alternatives
FIS Quantum, GTreasury, ION Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementOne alternative
SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementThree alternatives
GTreasury, ION Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementGLM 4.7 FlashXKyribaPhrase TMS, SmartlingChangedKyribaKyribaagainst: Trovatano first choiceagainst: Agicap, FIS Integrity, Salmon, TreasuryXpress
Five alternatives
FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud, HighRadius Treasury Management, Modern Treasury, Ripple Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementFour alternatives
RWS Trados Enterprise, TransPerfect GlobalLink, Translated, XTMSix alternatives
FIS Quantum, GTreasury, ION Treasury, Modern Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, TrovataOne alternative
GTreasuryMiniMax M2.5HighRadius Treasury ManagementWorkdayChangedKyribaPalm Treasury, Treasury4 TMSno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ION Treasury, KyribaFour alternatives
Betterworks, Cornerstone, Oracle HCM Cloud / Oracle Talent Management Cloud, SAP SuccessFactorsFour alternatives
FIS Quantum, Ripple Treasury, SAP Treasury and Risk Management, TISThree alternatives
GTreasury, Kyriba, TrovataBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:27 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:17 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:18 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:15 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:52 | yes | 28 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:52 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:23 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:53 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:42 | yes | 10 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:48 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:58 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:48 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:45 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:39 | yes | 31 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:14 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:45 | yes | 27 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:14 | yes | 15 | 105 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:06 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:22 | yes | 19 | 69 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:01 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:26 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:19 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:17 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:31 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:07 | yes | 23 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:30 | yes | 16 | 15 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:16 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:05 | yes | 8 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:32 | yes | 17 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:35 | yes | 25 | 117 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:01 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:32 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:19 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:53 | yes | 19 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:07 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:56 | yes | 36 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:45 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:41 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:56 | yes | 14 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:00 | yes | 21 | 121 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:02 | yes | 17 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:05 | yes | 18 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:18 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:57 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:03 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:49 | yes | 20 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:58 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:06 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:44 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:40 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:06 | yes | 26 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:07 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:31 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:09 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:18 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:41 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:12 | yes | 21 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:05 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:28 | yes | 27 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:59 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:55 | yes | 29 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:01 | yes | 31 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:50 | yes | 8 | 96 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Coupa read as Coupa Treasury
HighRadius read as HighRadius Treasury Management
HighRadius Autonomous Treasury read as HighRadius Treasury Management
HighRadius Treasury read as HighRadius Treasury Management
ION read as ION Treasury
ION (Reval) read as ION Treasury
ION Group (Reval, Wallstreet Suite, IT2) read as ION Treasury
ION Wallstreet Suite read as ION Treasury
Oracle read as Oracle Treasury
Oracle ERP read as Oracle Treasury
Oracle Treasury Management read as Oracle Treasury
Rho read as Rho Treasury
Round read as Round Treasury
SAP read as SAP Treasury and Risk Management
SAP Treasury read as SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Cegid Allmybanks
Ceridian Dayforce HCM
Cornerstone
Cornerstone OnDemand
Descartes TMS
ERP-Native Modules (SAP Treasury or Oracle Treasury)
Finmo (Enterprise plan)
Fintech (formerly Indus)
Oracle HCM Cloud
Oracle HCM Cloud / Oracle Talent Management Cloud
Palm Treasury
RWS Trados Enterprise
Trados (SDL Trados Cloud)
TransPerfect GlobalLink
Translated
Treasury4 TMS
XTM
memoQ TMS
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.