Index › Finance › Treasury and cash › Stablecoin platforms › NOWPayments vs CoinGate
Stablecoin platforms · November 2026 Edition

NOWPayments vs CoinGate

Zero of fourteen models named NOWPayments first on the direct prompt; zero named CoinGate. NOWPayments was named by eight of the fourteen models and CoinGate by eleven and NOWPayments carries 12 labels and CoinGate 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

NOWPayments

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

CoinGate

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share12%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1211A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, NOWPayments reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.BVNK was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. BVNK vs NOWPayments · BVNK vs CoinGate · NOWPayments vs Request Finance

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the stablecoin platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
NOWPaymentsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCoinGate
Direct002 against NOWPayments
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained52
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, NOWPayments and CoinGate were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 31 answers naming NOWPayments and the 28 naming CoinGate. In those answers CoinGate took the first choice three times and NOWPayments nine.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where NOWPayments and CoinGate stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
NOWPayments CoinGate first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, NOWPayments on the left and CoinGate on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where NOWPayments and CoinGate stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5BVNK alternatives: Crossmint, OSL BizPay
GPT-5.4 miniCircle's CPN / Managed Payments alternatives: BVNK, Bridge, Fireblocks
Gemini 3.5 FlashRequest Finance alternatives: BVNK, Bridge, Mural Pay, Triple-A
Perplexity SonarRequest Finance alternatives: BVNK, Bridge, Circle, Stripe Crypto
Grok 4.20BVNK alternatives: Circle, Conduit, Stripe Bridge
Mistral SmallBVNK, Circle
DeepSeek V4 FlashRequest Finance alternatives: BVNK, Circle, Stripe Crypto
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashMural Pay alternatives: BVNK, Circle Payments, PhotonPay, Stripe Crypto
Kimi K2BVNK alternatives: Request Finance, Stripe Crypto
GLM 4.7 FlashXBVNK alternatives: Fipto, Triple-A
MiniMax M2.5Mural Pay alternatives: BVNK, Request Finance, TokenFi
GPT-6 LunaMastercard Global Money Platform alternatives: Circle, Stripe Crypto
Muse Glimmer 30BRequest Finance alternatives: BVNK, Bridge, Circle, Stripe Crypto

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
NOWPayments leads by six points.
NOWPayments12%#3 of 12
CoinGate6%#5 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
NOWPayments leads by seven points.
NOWPayments12%#2 of 12
CoinGate5%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Neither is named for this buyer.
NOWPayments—not named
CoinGate—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about NOWPayments

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“it's more merchant-oriented (less B2B treasury depth) and has limited regulatory licensing compared to the others” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“generally less comprehensive for complex B2B stablecoin payments compared to BVNK and Circle” Mistral Small · direct prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with NOWPayments due to its competitive 0.5%-1% fees, no monthly costs” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Why NOWPayments is a top pick: The 0.5% base rate is the lowest among the big hosted gateways.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small companies on a limited budget, NOWPayments is the best overall choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about CoinGate

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“CoinGate is likely the best starting point if the main goal is accepting stablecoin payments” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“with CoinGate offering a lower processing fee (1% vs. 2% + $0.25)” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for EU Businesses ... Best for: EU-based businesses needing MiCA-licensed compliance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.