Internal controls and SOX · November 2026 Edition
Process Street vs Onspring
Zero of fourteen models named Process Street first on the direct prompt; zero named Onspring. Process Street was named by nine of the fourteen models and Onspring by nine and both carry 12 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels1212Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Process Street reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.FloQast was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. FloQast vs Process Street · FloQast vs Onspring · AuditBoard vs Process Street
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Internal controls and SOX page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Process StreetFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOnspring
Direct00
Paraphrase01
Comparative00
Budget-constrained201 against Onspring
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Process Street and Onspring stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Process Street Onspring first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Process Street on the left and Onspring on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Process Street and Onspring stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.20FloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring
DeepSeek V4 FlashFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring, Optro, VComply, Workiva
GLM 4.7 FlashXFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring, Workiva
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Optro alternatives: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, FloQast, Netwrix Auditor, Resolver
GPT-5.4 miniOptro, Workiva alternatives: FloQast
Gemini 3.5 FlashAuditBoard alternatives: FloQast, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Workiva
Perplexity SonarFloQast alternatives: Hyperproof, Optro, Workiva
Mistral SmallScytale, Workiva alternatives: Optro, Sprinto
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashAuditBoard, VComply alternatives: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Drata, Vanta
Kimi K2FloQast alternatives: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, ComplyJet, Pathlock, Vanta
MiniMax M2.5AuditBoard, FloQast alternatives: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Pathlock, Vanta
GPT-6 LunaFloQast Compliance Management alternatives: Optro, Workiva
Muse Glimmer 30BFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Diligent One Platform, Optro, Workiva
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Process Street leads by three points.
Process Street5%#5 of 14Onspring2%#– of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Process Street leads by two points.
Process Street4%#7 of 18Onspring2%#8 of 18Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Process Street0%#– of 14Onspring0%#– of 14What the models said about Process Street
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Process Street *(Best for Minimal Budgets & Small Teams)* ... simple, predictable SaaS pricing model with low onboarding friction” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Process Street ⭐ Best Overall for Limited Budgets” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Process Street or Optro: Workflow-heavy options; ideal if your gap is recurring control execution with evidence capture.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · alternative
What the models said about Onspring
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“they're typically better if your compliance program is growing beyond just SOX” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Onspring is the best overall recommendation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Cloud-based GRC for mid-market; handles SOX testing, issues, and reporting across frameworks.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · alternative
“Consider Onspring or Centraleyes if you also need broader risk management” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
FloQast vs Process StreetFloQast vs OnspringAuditBoard vs Process StreetAuditBoard vs OnspringWorkiva vs Process StreetWorkiva vs OnspringHyperproof vs Process StreetHyperproof vs OnspringOptro vs Process StreetOptro vs OnspringVComply vs Process StreetVComply vs OnspringAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full internal controls standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.