Index › Finance › Tax and compliance › Internal controls › FloQast vs Onspring
Internal controls and SOX · November 2026 Edition

FloQast vs Onspring

Seven of fourteen models named FloQast first on the direct prompt; zero named Onspring. FloQast was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Onspring by nine and FloQast carries 20 labels and Onspring 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

FloQast

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

Onspring

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share23%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels2012A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FloQast reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Workiva was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. FloQast vs AuditBoard · FloQast vs Workiva · FloQast vs Hyperproof

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Internal controls and SOX page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FloQastFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOnspring
Direct70
Paraphrase41
Comparative00
Budget-constrained002 against FloQast · 1 against Onspring
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where FloQast and Onspring stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
FloQast Onspring first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FloQast on the left and Onspring on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FloQast and Onspring stood in it.

FloQast first, Onspring an alternative

7 of 14 modelsOnspring was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarFloQast alternatives: Hyperproof, Optro, Workiva
Grok 4.20FloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring
DeepSeek V4 FlashFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring, Optro, VComply, Workiva
Kimi K2FloQast alternatives: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, ComplyJet, Pathlock, Vanta
GLM 4.7 FlashXFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring, Workiva
MiniMax M2.5AuditBoard, FloQast alternatives: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Pathlock, Vanta
Muse Glimmer 30BFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Diligent One Platform, Optro, Workiva

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Optro alternatives: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, FloQast, Netwrix Auditor, Resolver
GPT-5.4 miniOptro, Workiva alternatives: FloQast
Gemini 3.5 FlashAuditBoard alternatives: FloQast, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Workiva

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallScytale, Workiva alternatives: Optro, Sprinto
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashAuditBoard, VComply alternatives: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Drata, Vanta
GPT-6 LunaFloQast Compliance Management alternatives: Optro, Workiva

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Onspring leads by two points.
Onspring2%#– of 14
FloQast0%#12 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: FloQast leads at mid-market.
FloQast23%#1 of 18
Onspring2%#8 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
FloQast leads by two points.
FloQast2%#11 of 14
Onspring0%#– of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about FloQast

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Onspring

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“they're typically better if your compliance program is growing beyond just SOX” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Onspring is the best overall recommendation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Cloud-based GRC for mid-market; handles SOX testing, issues, and reporting across frameworks.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · alternative
“Consider Onspring or Centraleyes if you also need broader risk management” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.