FloQast vs Workiva
Seven of fourteen models named FloQast first on the direct prompt; two named Workiva. FloQast was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Workiva by fourteen and FloQast carries 20 labels and Workiva 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Internal controls and SOX page.
By framing
FloQastFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkiva
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, FloQast and Workiva were named in the same answer 122 times, of the 414 answers naming FloQast and the 539 naming Workiva. In those answers Workiva took the first choice ten times and FloQast thirty.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
FloQast Workiva first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FloQast on the left and Workiva on the right.The direct prompt
FloQast first, Workiva an alternative
7 of 14 modelsWorkiva was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Workiva first, FloQast an alternative
2 of 14 modelsFloQast was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
FloQast23%#1 of 18Workiva9%#3 of 18Workiva23%#1 of 14FloQast2%#11 of 14What the models said about FloQast
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about Workiva
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Avoid starting with Workiva, Optro/AuditBoard, or Diligent unless the company needs a full enterprise SOX” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd usually recommend Workiva if your main need is internal controls management tied to financial reporting/SOX-style workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.